Bronte Nut
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2006
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 0
With great respect, I never suggested at any time that you needed full spectrum DNA to exclude the Ramseys. The limited 10-array sample was enough to exclude Karr, and presumably the Ramseys, too - although with them being the parents, it would be very hard to pin a charge on them based on DNA, as their DNA could have quite legitimately been all over her.magnolia said:A full spectrum DNA sample was not required to exclude the Ramsey's.
I don't think anyone is so naive to believe that the Ramsey's wouldn't lie.
I do, however, believe the Ramsey's are a bit more intelligent than you are giving them credit for.
Who would compose a ransom note in their own writing in an effort to stage a kidnapping and leave the child in the basement of the home?:waitasec:
Don't you think it would have occurred to either Patsy or John that.....Hey, if we leave a ransom note, we need to remove the body from the house so the kidnapping will be believable. Do you think possibly they thought it was just too cold outside to consider taking the body to another location so they decided the basement would suffice.
Burke, being only nine at the time could have staged a better scenario than this.
My entire point, which a staggering number of people seem to completely miss or deliberately ignore, is that any intruder who had such close and prolonged physical contact with the child, would have almost certainly left behind some DNA somewhere significant.
It may be that the forensics people failed miserably to collect the crime scene DNA correctly. If they did collect it properly and comprehensively, there does not appear to have been ANY credible non-Ramsey DNA, and if there wasn't any credible non-Ramsey DNA, and there was no evidence of an intruder...
Even if the limited DNA sample had matched any of the Ramseys, it would not have in ANY way proved their guilt, with them being family. The main point about the DNA is that there was no non-Ramsey DNA present at the crime scene, which is highly suspicious in itself. Almost impossible, in fact.
The Ramseys being "cleared by DNA" is simply a cheap stunt by their big-mouth pinheaded lawyer to throw out some meaningless chaff. It is supremely irrelevant.
Hey, we're all still friends, right?