Ames
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 5,838
- Reaction score
- 57
Let her show up on my doorstep and there'll really be a fight!
If she shows up on your doorstep, could you claw one of her eyeballs out for ME, SuperDave?? TIA
Let her show up on my doorstep and there'll really be a fight!
If I had matching unknown male DNA in more than one form, on more than one article of clothing that I don't remember putting on, with some of the unknown male DNA mixed in with stains of my blood, I would be VERY amazed.
__________________
Just because there is one more piece to the puzzle to consider (this new Touch DNA) one cannot exclude the other pieces, like the ransom note, Patsy's sweater fibers found on the garrote knot and on the sticky side of the duct tape, the reference to $118,000 in the note, the pineapple, or the actions of the Ramsey's following the crime. The DNA does not PROVE it belonged to the killer. For all we know it belongs to a 5 year old boy.
It's just one more piece of evidence to be considered, but it certainly does not exonerate the Ramsey's, especially if JonBenet was being sexually molested on an on-going basis prior to the crime which was the consenses by experts. The Ramsey's are not innocent of anything in my book. Even if this DNA turned out to be linked to the crime, the Ramsey's did everything they could to not cooperate with authorities. Patsy Ramsey exhibits classic signs of mental illness.
Today 02:15 AM
Olive,
You stated "I suppose it is possible that the Ramsey's knew the killer, or knew information about the crime. However, I believe the evidence speaks for itself as to who assaulted/killed her. It wasn't them."
Just because there is one more piece to the puzzle to consider (this new Touch DNA) one cannot exclude the other pieces, like the ransom note, Patsy's sweater fibers found on the garrote knot and on the sticky side of the duct tape, the reference to $118,000 in the note, the pineapple, or the actions of the Ramsey's following the crime. The DNA does not PROVE it belonged to the killer. For all we know it belongs to a 5 year old boy.
It's just one more piece of evidence to be considered, but it certainly does not exonerate the Ramsey's, especially if JonBenet was being sexually molested on an on-going basis prior to the crime which was the consenses by experts. The Ramsey's are not innocent of anything in my book. Even if this DNA turned out to be linked to the crime, the Ramsey's did everything they could to not cooperate with authorities. Patsy Ramsey exhibits classic signs of mental illness.
Jane Osa said:If Patsy did this - she was indeed very mentally, well, troubled. I try to let the facts settle in my mind and see what may come out intuitively - but not a heck lot does. It's the sheer lunacy of the situation....mainly, the ransom note - it's crazy. I posted early, that if P. premeditated this (and if she has a mental disorder, even a borderline personality disorder, it's possible) - she did certain things, especially the note, as a little 'jab' to John...all the little details & innuendos, etc. That note is a sign of lunacy - perhaps done in the 'heat' of the moment or done by someone (in cold blood) who was not mentally stable.
Even if this DNA turned out to be linked to the crime, the Ramsey's did everything they could to not cooperate with authorities. Patsy Ramsey exhibits classic signs of mental illness.
Not cooperating with the authorities, and mental illness, are your claims that even if true, aren't murder. If the DNA was linked to the crime, then thats murder.
PR over-cooperated in my book. She agreed to write the ransom note exact words with both hands, after having seen the original. Technically her samples could be thrown out, because those handwriting 'samples' weren't 'samples' at all. They were not randomly collected, nor were they written in an unbiased way. She knew what the words were and how they looked before she started writing, and that makes her samples void.
There's no such thing as 'over cooperating' when you want to find out who killed your child.
Of course there is!
You know you've overcooperated as soon as someone then draws the wrong conclusion and stops looking for who really killed your child.
Not cooperating with the authorities, and mental illness, are your claims that even if true, aren't murder. If the DNA was linked to the crime, then thats murder.
PR over-cooperated in my book. She agreed to write the ransom note exact words with both hands, after having seen the original. Technically her samples could be thrown out, because those handwriting 'samples' weren't 'samples' at all. They were not randomly collected, nor were they written in an unbiased way. She knew what the words were and how they looked before she started writing, and that makes her samples void.
Well thank God most criminals don't "overcooperate" the way the Ramseys did.
But then they don't get that chance, because every place is not like Boulder. We can thank God for that to.
If you believe in God.
PR over-cooperated in my book. She agreed to write the ransom note exact words with both hands, after having seen the original. Technically her samples could be thrown out, because those handwriting 'samples' weren't 'samples' at all. They were not randomly collected, nor were they written in an unbiased way. She knew what the words were and how they looked before she started writing, and that makes her samples void
There's no such thing as 'over cooperating' when you want to find out who killed your child.
You know you've overcooperated as soon as someone then draws the wrong conclusion and stops looking for who really killed your child.
Not cooperating with the authorities, and mental illness, are your claims that even if true, aren't murder. If the DNA was linked to the crime, then thats murder.
PR over-cooperated in my book. She agreed to write the ransom note exact words with both hands, after having seen the original. Technically her samples could be thrown out, because those handwriting 'samples' weren't 'samples' at all. They were not randomly collected, nor were they written in an unbiased way. She knew what the words were and how they looked before she started writing, and that makes her samples void.