I believe that Varrone’s characterization of SG’s demeanor on 911 call as incoherent, anxiety-fueled, and possibly drug-fueled, is significant precisely because it contradicts SCPD’s original statement about SG’s demeanor on the 911 call (that she did not sound at all distressed, and that she was calm during the 911 call).
But just like everything else related to SCPD’s involvement in this case (SG), as well as possibly related LISK case, this makes absolutely no sense:
At the time of SCPD’s original statement release about the 911 call, Varrone was the lead detective in LISK investigation. He must have been consulted by the team working the SG case since the LISK investigation had really just started (while searching for SG body)…
But SCPD has claimed that the 911 call can’t be released because it’s part of an active investigation? Is that in relation to LISK, SG wrongful death civil suit against Hackett (or SCPD for that matter—both Dormer and Varrone have made claims that SG most likely succumbed to the elements as far as cause of death).
It’s all truly unbelievable…