Sidebar Discussion #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess JB has moved from the "smell test" to the "laugh test".

Here is the test, can you look at a man in skinny jeans standing on a log without laughing?:waitasec:
 
I guess JB has moved from the "smell test" to the "laugh test".

Here is the test, can you look at a man in skinny jeans standing on a log without laughing?:waitasec:

............... :okay:...I looked....it's okay....and the answer is...:lol: ....a unanimous :gasp: ...:woot: ......NO¡
 
I loved JB's co-council, said something to the effect of .... IMO I have no idea.
 
I would bet $100 this was not reported to law enforcement.

Why? She has already been convicted to lying to LE and doing this again would violate her probation land land her in jail.

-------------
If She or her team accept any money for this story
that should go against probation unless they can prove it really happened.
My guess is she is in the same place she has been. Who the h*l! wants her!:floorlaugh:
 
I think the As are in contact with FCA. It would not surprise me if FCA spent Thanksgiving at Hopespring Drive.

JB and Lippman initially said FCA had limited contact with her family. That could mean anything...visits, phone calls, etc. JB changed his story from 'limited' contact to 'no contact'. They all lie as easily as they breath.

IMO
 
I guess it's official. If you want to get away with murder, make sure to do the dirty deed in Aruba. Or Orlando. And make sure Jose Baez is lurking somewhere nearby. Good Gawd.

ht_gardner_aruba_jef_110919_wg.jpg
 
I think the As are in contact with FCA. It would not surprise me if FCA spent Thanksgiving at Hopespring Drive.

JB and Lippman initially said FCA had limited contact with her family. That could mean anything...visits, phone calls, etc. JB changed his story from 'limited' contact to 'no contact'. They all lie as easily as they breath.

IMO

This is one of the rare times I am going to disagree with you Jon_Burrows. I believe it is only Baez who has said there was limited contact - Lippman has consistently said there is no contact and his last media blurb said "zero" contact.
I think OCA has completely cut her ties to her family - she has no use for them now that she has a new family. She wants a new life and believes her self a star who can rehabilitate herself in the eyes of the world now that the "poor victim has cut her ties with her highly dysfunctional family" who caused all these problems for her in the first place. She is about to reinvent herself and have a new life or so she thinks. What possible use could CA and GA be to her when in her mind they will forever tie her to this crime.

Nope, don't believe there was a Thanksgiving dinner at Hopespring Drive that included OCA.
 
I guess it's official. If you want to get away with murder, make sure to do the dirty deed in Aruba. Or Orlando. And make sure Jose Baez is lurking somewhere nearby. Good Gawd.

ht_gardner_aruba_jef_110919_wg.jpg

Are you sure it's not just Aruba? Something very familiar going on here - haven't we all been here before? :furious:
 
Here's something I am really puzzling over. It's an O/T question - but I am really interested in your answers if you can spare me a thought or two.

We have an "all faiths" TV station in town, and not long ago I was stopped on the street by their roving reporter and asked the question that we hear often.

If a fire broke out in your home and you could save one thing - what would it be?

I said "my dogs". The reporter was stunned. He said "your dogs?" What about all of your photographs, your memories?" "How could you say your dogs??"

I was blown away! I told him my dogs rely on me for their well being - they are basically helpless without me to feed and care for them. They are living beings. I could never abandon something living for something inanimate like photographs. I told him I carry my memories in my mind and my heart but I could never live with myself if I let my dogs suffer and die to choose memories. My photographs and memories are the past - the present is something living and breathing.

The reporter looked at me like I was completely nuts and like I'd gone over the edge or something. Help me out here - have I actually lost it and just don't know or am I completely cold hearted about my family memories/photos etc.? Seriously....:waitasec:
 
Here's something I am really puzzling over. It's an O/T question - but I am really interested in your answers if you can spare me a thought or two.

We have an "all faiths" TV station in town, and not long ago I was stopped on the street by their roving reporter and asked the question that we hear often.

If a fire broke out in your home and you could save one thing - what would it be?

I said "my dogs". The reporter was stunned. He said "your dogs?" What about all of your photographs, your memories?" "How could you say your dogs??"

I was blown away! I told him my dogs rely on me for their well being - they are basically helpless without me to feed and care for them. They are living beings. I could never abandon something living for something inanimate like photographs. I told him I carry my memories in my mind and my heart but I could never live with myself if I let my dogs suffer and die to choose memories. My photographs and memories are the past - the present is something living and breathing.

The reporter looked at me like I was completely nuts and like I'd gone over the edge or something. Help me out here - have I actually lost it and just don't know or am I completely cold hearted about my family memories/photos etc.? Seriously....:waitasec:


Great answer, logicalgirl. I would do exactly the same thing...it's a no brainer! Sure, it would be sad to lose family photos and things of sentimental value, but no way I would leave a helpless animal to die. Pets are family members, too!
 
Great answer, logicalgirl. I would do exactly the same thing...it's a no brainer! Sure, it would be sad to lose family photos and things of sentimental value, but no way I would leave a helpless animal to die. Pets are family members, too!

Whew! Thank you! Being Canadian :great: I was just lost in "EH?" "What?" Really if you could have seen this man's face - he was just shocked! And so was I - for the completely opposite reason...it was really weird....I walked away thinking WTH and looked back and he was just standing there staring at me...:waitasec:
 
Justice delayed is justice denied? Are you freaking kidding me? The guy who dragged out the road to a court case for three years and then continued to drag his heels throughout the court case itself? For a case you had the audacity to claim was in fact an accidental drowning and not a murder at all? A man who is a waste - a huge waste of time...

If only I could express myself the way I really want to....:furious:

He's not even trying to make sense anymore. The FL Bar Association must be beaming with pride.
 
Here's something I am really puzzling over. It's an O/T question - but I am really interested in your answers if you can spare me a thought or two.

We have an "all faiths" TV station in town, and not long ago I was stopped on the street by their roving reporter and asked the question that we hear often.

If a fire broke out in your home and you could save one thing - what would it be?

I said "my dogs". The reporter was stunned. He said "your dogs?" What about all of your photographs, your memories?" "How could you say your dogs??"

I was blown away! I told him my dogs rely on me for their well being - they are basically helpless without me to feed and care for them. They are living beings. I could never abandon something living for something inanimate like photographs. I told him I carry my memories in my mind and my heart but I could never live with myself if I let my dogs suffer and die to choose memories. My photographs and memories are the past - the present is something living and breathing.

The reporter looked at me like I was completely nuts and like I'd gone over the edge or something. Help me out here - have I actually lost it and just don't know or am I completely cold hearted about my family memories/photos etc.? Seriously....:waitasec:

You haven't fallen from your rocker LG, but that guy is a fruitcake.
 
I dunno - she had to have felt something somewhere along those lines. She spent so much time with Caylee - even if it wasn't a motherly feeling - you'd think maybe she misses the routine of caring for Caylee all day.

I wish. But I doubt it is even possible for KC to feel true sorrow or regret. I think she is defective in ways that leave her void of the capacity to care enough about anything or anyone to dwell. I think she moved on a long time ago about the murder, and that she never had any feelings toward Caylee in life other than jealousy and resentment--those feelings are about the only ones that come easy to self-centered individuals.
 
I dunno - she had to have felt something somewhere along those lines. She spent so much time with Caylee - even if it wasn't a motherly feeling - you'd think maybe she misses the routine of caring for Caylee all day.

Uh nooooo, that's why she killed her. She cherishes not having to take care of the snothead anymore. She's having fun hiding and wearing disguises, no kid to take care of, no responsibilities. She doesn't miss anything about Caylee at all. She's not normal. She doesn't have the capacity to have any regretful feelings about Caylee. It's all about Casey and her needs. Caylee who?
 
The reporter looked at me like I was completely nuts and like I'd gone over the edge or something. Help me out here - have I actually lost it and just don't know or am I completely cold hearted about my family memories/photos etc.? Seriously....:waitasec:
(respectfully snipped for space)
I've always hated that silly question. There wouldn't even be a thought process to undertake - I believe I would instinctively grab the pets. And if I didn't do it instinctively, I'd grab the pets!
 
Whew! Thank you! Being Canadian :great: I was just lost in "EH?" "What?" Really if you could have seen this man's face - he was just shocked! And so was I - for the completely opposite reason...it was really weird....I walked away thinking WTH and looked back and he was just standing there staring at me...:waitasec:

:floorlaugh:
Were you wearing your mini skirt and, what was it, tights?
 
:floorlaugh:
Were you wearing your mini skirt and, what was it, tights?

:floorlaugh: No not that time - I think I was looking unusually respectable..:innocent:

Er...tights - definition: black or whatever colour stockings you cannot see through. Worn unwisely by anyone over 30 with an extremely short skirt or even more unfortunately, with no skirt at all....think Robin Hood...:giggle:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
58
Guests online
198
Total visitors
256

Forum statistics

Threads
609,775
Messages
18,257,805
Members
234,757
Latest member
Kezzie
Back
Top