Which photofit? The Eggman or this dude?
Or there is a third portrait done with Tanner I don't know about?
Seriously, Tanner changed her story so many times she has zero credibility in my eyes. Zero.
Like all the best lies, it has a kernel of truth.
The Smiths confirmed that it was common to see parents walking with sleeping children around PDL at that time of night. Not many folks have cars and the distances are very short anyway, tourists are about at odd hours (jet lag).
Tanner probably did see some guy with his daughter, and then used it to base her allegations on. Did Crimewatch confirm the exact timing she saw this guy, or explain why Gerry and Jez did not see him? Apparently she saw a father carrying a sleeping child, but did Crimewatch confirm
when? Why didn't the PJ find this father earlier?
This explains the pause in between seeing the guy and telling LE about him - about two hours.
She knew all along her sighting wasn't of Madeleine but used it for a red herring, probably at the insistence of the overwhelming Gerry.
Heck they probably had all seen sleeping babies being carried by parents, all holiday, every night they left Tapas someone probably walked past them picking up their own child from the night creche. It was a common sight.
It could have been part of the plot "there's so many parents doing this, we wont stand out".
These people, while woefully short in common sense, are not exactly stupid. This is part of a "pact" and someone clever thought up answers to everything.
Except of course, the Smiths...the one aspect that couldn't be foreseen.
:cow: