MustlyLurking
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2011
- Messages
- 193
- Reaction score
- 3
The jury didn't even consider the chloroform searches anyway. She was still guilty with all the other evidence.
That jury didn't consider anything.
The jury didn't even consider the chloroform searches anyway. She was still guilty with all the other evidence.
You know what ticks me off.
Mis information that has been flying around in this thread. Like the fact that it was NOT typed in the search box "HOW TO MAKE CHLOROFORM". It most certainly WAS typed out. FCA did INDEED type out how to make chloroform and used google search under her password protected username.
Mis information will soon be thought of as absolute truth and some might think that gee maybe FCA didn't get away with murder. And then we feed into just what the DT did to this jury. They muddied the waters and hoped they confused the jury enough that they wouldn't convict her, and that's what happened. But in truth it wouldn't take much to confuse the likes of this particular jury.
Please if you haven't watched the entire trial like some of us please visit www.wftv.com before you post what you know to be "truths" and make sure you listen to the particular testimony before you post. Others will be looking at these posts in the coming months and years and take this mis information and interpretation as truth.
If LDB had corrected the report in open court JP would have HAD to give an instruction to the jury. No woulda, coulda, shoulda. He would have had to in order to ensure due process.
Not only did that not happen, but the most glaring omission is a motion for a mistrial based on incorrect information being testified to the jurors.
There was NEVER a correction by the state.
Originally Posted by JSR View Post
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone please RE READ THE ABOVE DEFINITION!!!!!!!!!
What we have here is a MISINTERPRETATION of evidence! Not a willful Brady violation!!!!
There is NOTHING exculpatory about this evidence, absolutely NOTHING. And it would not have been overturned by a higher court because it would have had to show that the exclusion of this evidence would have changed the outcome of the trial, which IMO it wouldn't have, especially if she was convicted on a lesser charge than 1st degree murder. If that was the only evidence the state had then yes it could have been likely the conviction would have been overturned. Because really all the searches show are premeditation.
If I didn't know better I would think JA was the one on trial and not FCA. It's important to note that the defense was saying it was Cindy who did these searches so it's moot. And c'mon let's get real 84 or 1 time visiting this site? Even once is bad enough coupled with the rest of the evidence.
If you want to talk about misconduct I think you're criticism would be better leveled at the one counsel who was REPEATEDLY reprimanded in open court by HHJP for violating discovery rules. Not just once but REPEATEDLY!
Link please?
Actually, Bradley sent out a press release dated 7/11 and then he corrected the dates of some of the occurrences in an updated press release today. http://www.cacheback.ca/news/news_release-20110711-1.asp
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, July 11, 2011
(Amended 2011-JUL-19)
Computer Evidence in the Casey Anthony Trial - A Post Mortem
I don't trust this man.
From Forbes online:
Prosecutor Misconduct In Casey Anthony Case Alleged
http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/07/19/prosecutor-misconduct-in-casey-anthony-case-alleged/
[/SIZE]http://kevinfortruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/prosecutorial-misconduct-%E2%80%93-to-say-the-least-%E2%80%93-should-heads-roll/
This is just another red herring thrown out by the DT to soften Casey's public image and garner sympathy so people will be inclined to hear her story and make them all some big $$$$. Nope, still not interested.
Move along folks, nothing to see here. :cow:
Please go back and watch the portions of the trial. IIRC LDB said so in open court that there was an error and it was discussed among the parties in front of HHJP.
And to give a jury instruction to the Jury was the judge's decision NOT the SA. So if there was an error made it was on HHJP's decision not to instruct the jury. HHJP decided not to instruct the jury, so none was given.
ITA but you knew the attempted rehabilitation of Casey Anthony was going to start any day by her defenders and the DT in some way. There is too much money on the line for the DT. They know the current public opinion isn't going to help get them their glory and money like they initially thought after hearing the verdict. They need her to be more of a victim.
jmo
If LDB had corrected the report in open court JP would have HAD to give an instruction to the jury. No woulda, coulda, shoulda. He would have had to in order to ensure due process.
Not only did that not happen, but the most glaring omission is a motion for a mistrial based on incorrect information being testified to the jurors.
There was NEVER a correction by the state.
Thank you. Like I said on this same topic in another thread, I was convinced of her guilt long before this discrepancy, and this discrepancy doesn't change my mind in the least. This was not SA misconduct. It would not reverse the trial. This is being blown WAY out of proportion. There was a lot more circumstantial evidence that put chloroform in the back of Casey's trunk, and even visiting a website on How to Make Chloroform ONCE is not a good thing in my eyes. Programs can be wrong because they are made by humans. Humans make mistakes. If it was such a big issue, Baez would be on it like a dog on a bone. But she got ACQUITTED. So this is a MOOT POINT.
Ok just for *advertiser censored* and giggles, here is what would be considered a Brady violation and could have overturned any conviction if one had been given.
The state obtained a written or oral account by Cindy that she admitted to the searches of how to make chloroform but the state willfully withheld that information. Later the defense obtains the "confession" by Cindy that she made the searches.
That my friends is a Brady violation. That would be prosecution misconduct.
LDB did inform the defense of the error once she was notified. And she never mentioned Chloroform in her closing argument.
Was it a mistake, yes. Willful prosecutorial misconduct, no.
FCA received a more than fair trial. Did anyone catch how many attys showed up after the verdict was read??? She had close to 10+ attorneys working on her case, if not more. I didn't actually count how many. The State had 3 (count them THREE) SA's working on this case. The state of FL footed the entire bill for FCA and she received far more funds than the typical inmate charged with a crime. The only thing HHJP denied them was a jury consultant which there were able to get anyway by what many consider a less than ethical way. She was in protective custody the entire time and always had her commission account full so she could buy goodies.
To hear it here you would think FCA is to be believed of being the big bad victim of being framed by the SA. Believe me, IMO, the state didn't need the searches and should have just left them out entirely. Not that it would matter with this jury I don't even think a videotape of FCA killing Caylee would have been enough to convict her.
And seeing how quickly the SA's can be vilified shows just how easily FCA was able to get away with murder.
Link to what? I am asserting that she did NOT provide the correct information.
Originally Posted by GhostCrab
If LDB had corrected the report in open court JP would have HAD to give an instruction to the jury. No woulda, coulda, shoulda. He would have had to in order to ensure due process.
Not only did that not happen, but the most glaring omission is a motion for a mistrial based on incorrect information being testified to the jurors.
There was NEVER a correction by the state.
so what you are saying is, you think the defense team conspired with this cacheback dude to improve caseys image?