No, not what was found with the remains necessarily. The article doesn't say when investigators made this determination or what evidence was used in making the determination.
Caylee was reported missing July 15th, a month after she actually went missing.
Nothing in Casey's story about what happened to Caylee checked out.
At that time she was charged with child neglect and lying to LE. While an adult can choose to disappear legally as long as they aren't trying to commit fraud, society frowns on those who wave their magic wand and make their children disappear.
Preliminary forensics reports came back showing evidence of human decomposition in the trunk of the car Casey was using, that was considered 'her' car, even if it wasn't in her name. Hair was found consistent with Caylee. Still, no alive Caylee is produced.
People were interviewed. No one, other than George, even claims to have seen Caylee since June 15th. For all I know, Casey is still sticking to the June 9th story.
So here is the evidence we KNOW LE has.
Missing child.
No explanation of where child is that checks out.
No verifiable sighting of child since June 15 (16).
Testimony by several people of A) Casey seen with no Caylee, B) no firsthand knowledge of Zani the Nanny, C) everywhere Casey said Caylee was during this time is unsubstantiated
Video of several places showing Casey minus Caylee June 16-July 15.
Decomp that is consistent with child found in vehicle of last known person to see child.
Unusual levels of chloroform, a known toxic substance, found in same vehicle.
LE making a determination, and being found guilty by a court of law are two different things. What more do you think they should have to reach a determination that Caylee was killed by her mother? LE can't just sit around all day with their hands in their pockets waiting on a confession with video tape backup as proof.
Lanie