Tracey Stewart‏ @Traceyams 8m8 minutes ago @CapeTownEtc #vanbreda
Stewart, again, point I am trying to make that only when I write my report do I reference kit nr and bag nr
In all of the covering instructions we receive, only the 2nd page mentioned Marli's hair
Is ur evidence that you concentrate more on the kit nr than the bag nr? asks botha? yes
B- u wrote the actual kit nr is 14D3, you left out the 3 in your statement, not so?
Stewart - I must've left it out of all of them
B-is my statement correct that you made a mistake in the reference kit number by leaving out a 3?Yes I did repeatedly
Botha- but this kit number you said is the most important for you and all you use to reference.
Did u receive this report on 24.04.2015? Yes and on this covering letter you were given the bag seal no's
in respect of 3.2 3.3 and 3.4 of your report. In this covering letter you are told who are the donors of these reference samples
Yes correct. When you open the seal bag will there be a hair collection kit with different reference numbers? Correct
But in order to make statement in your report you would have had to look at the information in the cover letter? yes
Anthony Molyneaux‏ @AJGMolyneaux 6m6 minutes ago @TimesLIVE
Botha is continuing to show evidence that calls colonel Stewart's testimony of not knowing whose samples the hair belonged to into question. However, Stewart is sticking to his guns with stating that he did not know the origins of the samples.