https://twitter.com/Traceyams
Tracey Stewart‏ @Traceyams 2m2 minutes ago
Judge Desai: would person wielding it have to be strong, Dr A: not necessarily but it is heavy you need to be strong
Adv G now refers Dr Anthony to
Martin's post mortem
Evidence of external shock and blunt trauma involved the head and central upper back no evidence of defensive wounds
In this case indication that individual wasn't immediately dead with the trauma as he still inhaled blood aspirated to lungs
No other internal injuries just head injuries, he had a middle enlarged heart but that was natural pathology observation
Dr A cause of death was head injury and consequences thereof, skull injury and severe blood loss
Adv G: the defence has admitted all of your findings
The injuries on the head - the first two large lacerations that fit the description of the chop wound mentioned
Infliction of the trauma was most likely from behind
Dr A: the wounds on Martin are consistent with being hit from behind
DrA: the external wound I had to bring in context of skull fractures but dimensions are large as is skull fractures
Martin was wearing multi colored boxer shorts, sleep wear
DrA: no evidence of defensive wounds noted nothing on hand nothing on fingers, most likely not aware of the attack
Dr A:
Most likely unaware and surprised by the attack
@CapeTownEtc
https://twitter.com/AJGMolyneaux
Anthony Molyneaux‏ @AJGMolyneaux 2m2 minutes ago @TimesLIVE
Martin was hit from behind causing sharp force injuries at back of head & central, upper back where it meets neck.
DrA says dimensions of Marin's wounds are large wounds, meaning force was considerably large.
Martin had no wounds on his hands, wrists & forearms. DrA
says the Martin was surprised by attack as no defensive wounds.
( I think he was shielding his son, Rudi
)