South Africa - Martin, 55, Theresa, 54, Rudi Van Breda, 22, Murdered, 26 Jan 2015 #5
- Thread starter PrimeSuspect
- Start date
- Status
Jennifer17
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,552
- Reaction score
- 50,600
I can understand that. She has given a statement in how it has affected her, that she wants the court to know, but he is still her brother, whom she once loved, and maybe still has some love for him. She doesn't want the world to know, although she allowed the judge to know.
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
The judge won't know.
Galloway said, “I may just place on record at this point in time M’Lord , we are not - the State’s not going to give evidence nor are we going to hand in any victim impact statements to Court. We have addressed in our Heads the reasons why we are not doing so”.
Last edited:
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
Botha read a report containing a word unknown to Desai so he unsuccessfully tried to Google it. The word was euthymic.
Botha said, “He presented generally with an euthymic mood and was always calm”.
Euthymic - Relating to, or characterized by, euthymia.
“Euthymia is defined as a normal, tranquil mental state or mood”. It is often used to describe a stable mental state or mood in those affected with bipolar disorder that is neither manic nor depressive, yet is distinguishable from healthy controls.
Both the above quotes were taken directly from Wikipedia.
Botha said, “He presented generally with an euthymic mood and was always calm”.
Euthymic - Relating to, or characterized by, euthymia.
“Euthymia is defined as a normal, tranquil mental state or mood”. It is often used to describe a stable mental state or mood in those affected with bipolar disorder that is neither manic nor depressive, yet is distinguishable from healthy controls.
Both the above quotes were taken directly from Wikipedia.
Jennifer17
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,552
- Reaction score
- 50,600
If they are not handing them in, why bother taking them? Any of them?
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
There was probably only one (even though "them" was used) as Marli is the only surviving victim. I can only speculate.
Jennifer17
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2017
- Messages
- 9,552
- Reaction score
- 50,600
Relatives give victim impact statements, not only surviving victims.
Tortoise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2015
- Messages
- 26,470
- Reaction score
- 133,605
I wonder if this line means he is not planning on an appeal:
Will we ever know why Henri #VanBreda killed his family? | Cape Argus
“In this case I am searching for a human factor to some degree that diminishes the sheer seriousness of the crime. Let him say something that affords me to apply mercy.
“I want to be guided by you to an extent. I am appealing for you to put before me some reason for the attacks. Some reason for me to apply mercy,” said Judge Desai.
Defence lawyer Pieter Botha said he had no substantial and compelling circumstances to submit on behalf of the accused.
He said Van Breda maintained his innocence and had accepted the court’s decision of premeditated murder.
“The only substantial and compelling circumstances is his youthfulness and that he has no previous conviction,” he said.
Will we ever know why Henri #VanBreda killed his family? | Cape Argus
“In this case I am searching for a human factor to some degree that diminishes the sheer seriousness of the crime. Let him say something that affords me to apply mercy.
“I want to be guided by you to an extent. I am appealing for you to put before me some reason for the attacks. Some reason for me to apply mercy,” said Judge Desai.
Defence lawyer Pieter Botha said he had no substantial and compelling circumstances to submit on behalf of the accused.
He said Van Breda maintained his innocence and had accepted the court’s decision of premeditated murder.
“The only substantial and compelling circumstances is his youthfulness and that he has no previous conviction,” he said.
Christelle
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2018
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 45
Appealing is just postponing the inevitable. Let's see what happens after sentencing. That's usually when reality sets in.
Dora in the field
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2014
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 346
Euthymia is a greek word and it means good mood. When someone is euthymic they are cheerful, in a good mood.
Surely these comments from Botha, on behalf of Henri, are tantamount to a confession, in particular the comment that is highlighted. I do understand that the court will view it differently, but.....
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
And yet Danielle never testified for Henri in court...She loves him, she's in court during sentencing, she gets up to embrace his extended family, but doesn't testify. There's a clue in there, isn't there?
Nick van der Leek (@HiRezLife) | Twitter
Nick van der Leek (@HiRezLife) | Twitter
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
It's probably too early.
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
While we wait, you might like to read this.
While we wait, you might like to read these excerpts from the Judgment in The State vs DD (Don Steenkamp) who was 17 at the time. Just chilling. A link is attached for the whole Judgment.
"37. Twelfth: If the minor reacted as described by his relatives, and also by the investigating officer and further when he testified in court then it would be fair to say of him the deaths of his family left him cold; indifferent. He saw his father sprawled and full of blood. He looks at him and walks past. Next he sees his mother prostrate and bloodied and adopts a similar attitude. His beloved younger sister of 14 years, who was heavily wounded, strains every sinew, evidently to summon help; He has his cell phone with him. He does not call an ambulance or the police or a relative.
38. Thirteenth: Perhaps one of the most porous suggestions by the minor is that the farm-attacker would descent on the farm as a lone-ranger; would come on foot; would come unarmed; would evade the occupants of the house to reach the firearms at the furthest point in the house; kill the three deceased with their own weapons; spare the minor, who was with the intruder in the house, for no distinguishable reason from the others; leave R32 000,00 in cash and three wallets belonging to the three deceased containing wads of cash; walk away on foot when an appealing twin-cab Isuzu were there for the taking This Rambo is now once more unarmed. Perhaps when confronted by the police or the Neighbourhood Watch he would stick up his hands in the air and say: Sorry, I got lost. If this was true, the attacker would be dubbed the dumbest farm-attacker ever in South Africa.
58. Why did the minor escape totally unscathed? Why was the killer so kind-hearted towards the accused minor? Nonchalantly, he replied that he does not know. Mr Coetzee argued that it is for the State to supply the answer to its own questions. The State is not required to prove a negative or what was peculiarly within the contemplation of an accused’s mind at all relevant times.
59. I have deliberately refrained from commenting adversely or attaching any significance to the minors demeanour in the witness stand due to the length of the trial and that at 17 he is but a child who was subjected to searching but fair cross-examination. Except that I must say this: In the witness stand he showed no emotions. He has a strong voice and was assertive and confident. Even when he was painted into a corner he was not flushed. He never stammered or tripped over his words, even when he lied blatantly. He has a strong character. He is certainly not a wilting violet".
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2014/9.html
While we wait, you might like to read these excerpts from the Judgment in The State vs DD (Don Steenkamp) who was 17 at the time. Just chilling. A link is attached for the whole Judgment.
"37. Twelfth: If the minor reacted as described by his relatives, and also by the investigating officer and further when he testified in court then it would be fair to say of him the deaths of his family left him cold; indifferent. He saw his father sprawled and full of blood. He looks at him and walks past. Next he sees his mother prostrate and bloodied and adopts a similar attitude. His beloved younger sister of 14 years, who was heavily wounded, strains every sinew, evidently to summon help; He has his cell phone with him. He does not call an ambulance or the police or a relative.
38. Thirteenth: Perhaps one of the most porous suggestions by the minor is that the farm-attacker would descent on the farm as a lone-ranger; would come on foot; would come unarmed; would evade the occupants of the house to reach the firearms at the furthest point in the house; kill the three deceased with their own weapons; spare the minor, who was with the intruder in the house, for no distinguishable reason from the others; leave R32 000,00 in cash and three wallets belonging to the three deceased containing wads of cash; walk away on foot when an appealing twin-cab Isuzu were there for the taking This Rambo is now once more unarmed. Perhaps when confronted by the police or the Neighbourhood Watch he would stick up his hands in the air and say: Sorry, I got lost. If this was true, the attacker would be dubbed the dumbest farm-attacker ever in South Africa.
58. Why did the minor escape totally unscathed? Why was the killer so kind-hearted towards the accused minor? Nonchalantly, he replied that he does not know. Mr Coetzee argued that it is for the State to supply the answer to its own questions. The State is not required to prove a negative or what was peculiarly within the contemplation of an accused’s mind at all relevant times.
59. I have deliberately refrained from commenting adversely or attaching any significance to the minors demeanour in the witness stand due to the length of the trial and that at 17 he is but a child who was subjected to searching but fair cross-examination. Except that I must say this: In the witness stand he showed no emotions. He has a strong voice and was assertive and confident. Even when he was painted into a corner he was not flushed. He never stammered or tripped over his words, even when he lied blatantly. He has a strong character. He is certainly not a wilting violet".
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2014/9.html
JudgeJudi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 10,620
- Reaction score
- 31,357
While we wait, you might like to read these excerpts from the Judgment in The State vs DD (Don Steenkamp) who was 17 at the time. Just chilling.
"37. Twelfth: If the minor reacted as described by his relatives, and also by the investigating officer and further when he testified in court then it would be fair to say of him the deaths of his family left him cold; indifferent. He saw his father sprawled and full of blood. He looks at him and walks past. Next he sees his mother prostrate and bloodied and adopts a similar attitude. His beloved younger sister of 14 years, who was heavily wounded, strains every sinew, evidently to summon help; He has his cell phone with him. He does not call an ambulance or the police or a relative.
38. Thirteenth: Perhaps one of the most porous suggestions by the minor is that the farm-attacker would descent on the farm as a lone-ranger; would come on foot; would come unarmed; would evade the occupants of the house to reach the firearms at the furthest point in the house; kill the three deceased with their own weapons; spare the minor, who was with the intruder in the house, for no distinguishable reason from the others; leave R32 000,00 in cash and three wallets belonging to the three deceased containing wads of cash; walk away on foot when an appealing twin-cab Isuzu were there for the taking This Rambo is now once more unarmed. Perhaps when confronted by the police or the Neighbourhood Watch he would stick up his hands in the air and say: Sorry, I got lost. If this was true, the attacker would be dubbed the dumbest farm-attacker ever in South Africa.
58. Why did the minor escape totally unscathed? Why was the killer so kind-hearted towards the accused minor? Nonchalantly, he replied that he does not know. Mr Coetzee argued that it is for the State to supply the answer to its own questions. The State is not required to prove a negative or what was peculiarly within the contemplation of an accused’s mind at all relevant times.
59. I have deliberately refrained from commenting adversely or attaching any significance to the minors demeanour in the witness stand due to the length of the trial and that at 17 he is but a child who was subjected to searching but fair cross-examination. Except that I must say this: In the witness stand he showed no emotions. He has a strong voice and was assertive and confident. Even when he was painted into a corner he was not flushed. He never stammered or tripped over his words, even when he lied blatantly. He has a strong character. He is certainly not a wilting violet".
www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2014/9.html
"37. Twelfth: If the minor reacted as described by his relatives, and also by the investigating officer and further when he testified in court then it would be fair to say of him the deaths of his family left him cold; indifferent. He saw his father sprawled and full of blood. He looks at him and walks past. Next he sees his mother prostrate and bloodied and adopts a similar attitude. His beloved younger sister of 14 years, who was heavily wounded, strains every sinew, evidently to summon help; He has his cell phone with him. He does not call an ambulance or the police or a relative.
38. Thirteenth: Perhaps one of the most porous suggestions by the minor is that the farm-attacker would descent on the farm as a lone-ranger; would come on foot; would come unarmed; would evade the occupants of the house to reach the firearms at the furthest point in the house; kill the three deceased with their own weapons; spare the minor, who was with the intruder in the house, for no distinguishable reason from the others; leave R32 000,00 in cash and three wallets belonging to the three deceased containing wads of cash; walk away on foot when an appealing twin-cab Isuzu were there for the taking This Rambo is now once more unarmed. Perhaps when confronted by the police or the Neighbourhood Watch he would stick up his hands in the air and say: Sorry, I got lost. If this was true, the attacker would be dubbed the dumbest farm-attacker ever in South Africa.
58. Why did the minor escape totally unscathed? Why was the killer so kind-hearted towards the accused minor? Nonchalantly, he replied that he does not know. Mr Coetzee argued that it is for the State to supply the answer to its own questions. The State is not required to prove a negative or what was peculiarly within the contemplation of an accused’s mind at all relevant times.
59. I have deliberately refrained from commenting adversely or attaching any significance to the minors demeanour in the witness stand due to the length of the trial and that at 17 he is but a child who was subjected to searching but fair cross-examination. Except that I must say this: In the witness stand he showed no emotions. He has a strong voice and was assertive and confident. Even when he was painted into a corner he was not flushed. He never stammered or tripped over his words, even when he lied blatantly. He has a strong character. He is certainly not a wilting violet".
www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZANCHC/2014/9.html
- Status