Very sorry for your loss @BobbleBob, hope that this thread isn't too close to home for you at times.
Agree - Esther is clearly extremely intelligent, well qualified and certainly organised enough to live the life she has chosen out of a vehicle in a foreign country while documenting it and writing books. She also appears to feel her emotions very strongly and I'm sure many of us can imagine the total disruption that this might have on planning at times.
My gut feeling isn't that E&D were running out of money, more that they were keenly aware that their resources were finite and wanted to eke them out as long as possible. And maybe became quite competitive with themselves in finding ways of doing this so much so that it became their lifestyle.
I don't think we should read too much into the food or lack of food reports - Esther looks in amazing good health to me, the right sort of weight, strong and vibrant. She could have had all sorts of food tucked away in her bag, in reserve - we just don't know.
Also agree (as mentioned previously) that - among the many possibilities - she could have just had a very unfortunate accident, particularly in the fading light (tripping over shoelace - lol - I did that one while running to catch a train, luckily I hadn't reached the stairs), near sheer drops, with a heavy bag.
One factor that seems particularly pertinent to me is the timing of her disappearance - just after glowing national publicity. The blogs, the book, the lifestyle were all in effect "work" for E&D even if not wage-earning. The publicity painted something that was maybe not the reality, and maybe the relationship aspect was more complicated. If true, this must have felt complicated. There was a certain amount to live up to - difficult! Did Esther herself seek the publicity and did she welcome it? Again, could have led to decisions other than those expected of her.
I'm aware that this doesn't answer "where is she?" at all. For me it still could be any of the options we've discussed. I still really don't think she would choose to "abscond" for the sake of her loved ones.
PS @HongKongPhooey - I think "taking a break" is how it could be said in the UK, more a recent thing though (my teenager would say that)
I am one of your fellow Englanders and actually, I hear it called ‘taking a break‘ moreso than any other phraseology HKPAlso, we haven't actually heard from Esther. Its from a third party. I dont for one minute think the third party made it up but its possibly open to interpretation.
Something that bothers me a bit about the taking a break thing. Its not particularly an English term. Its an Americanism which came over with Friends I think! So its been here for a while and people no doubt do use it but I think more common would be having a breather, not together at the moment, having some time out..
It could just be the witness presented it that way, just slightly grates on me.
What do my fellow Englanders think?
<snipped for focus>
If Esther was considering leaving Dan, IMO this would include more devastation beyond the relationship breakup.
So much of their “brand”...their lifestyle monetization....was centered on this concept that this life of simplicity created happiness. IMO Esther leaving Dan would severely damage the brand and damage the ability of either one of them to depend financially on the books, etc.
Hi stmarysmead. Funny (although nothing about this case is funny!) I was musing about the same question you expressed here over my breakfast this morning.Just a few random thoughts.
Esther’s last two days before her disappearance interest me. On the 21/11 she thanks Dan for “ALL the messages to get me going” apparently receiving them as she prepares to leave the motorvan. Why did Dan feel he had to micromanage when she left? If this was HER trip, why besiege a capable adult woman to start...when DAN fedls she must? I find this interesting.
So she gets on her way, hitching, and faithfully keeps him informed. She reaches the Pic and checks in. Then in early afternoon she sets off again..but back toward the Cabana de la Besurtas.
Now, according to Dan...
‘Spends the night alone at Cabana de la Besurtas on the Spanish side (Esther had no phone signal once she left the peak, but she confirmed this the following day when she returned to Pic de Sauvegarde0’
Was this an excuse for no contact for over 24 hours?
Do we know independently that there is no phone signal between the Pic and the Cabana de la Besurtas? Esther had informed him...incorrectly...about the signal from the Refuge going forward on the French side, so are we sure he isn’t just relying on a similar misstatement?
From early afternoon till late afternoon the next day, we have no information about how she spends those hours. I’m curious if she was just seeking some quiet time, without his texts urging her to get going on HIS timetable. Or feeling controlled from afar. Or time to consider her fears, worries, etc without interruption or emotional pressure. Just speculating because we can’t know unless witnesses come forward. IMO Dan does not know either. The last texts and very short conversation probably did not afford time for any details.
This is a woman who seems to often rise at dawn, with many superb sunrise photos. Yet there is quite some time unaccounted for between arriving the night before at the Cabana and reaching the Pic in late afternoon the next day. And in that time she was seemingly alone with her thoughts.
My rambling thoughts and opinions only...
From Esther we have heard that they were taking a break and may not get back together. From Dan we hear that there were no relationship problems and they couldn’t wait to be back together. There has to be a reason why both give such conflicting reports....
Also, we haven't actually heard from Esther. Its from a third party. I dont for one minute think the third party made it up but its possibly open to interpretation.
Something that bothers me a bit about the taking a break thing. Its not particularly an English term. Its an Americanism which came over with Friends I think! So its been here for a while and people no doubt do use it but I think more common would be having a breather, not together at the moment, having some time out..
It could just be the witness presented it that way, just slightly grates on me.
What do my fellow Englanders think?
Just a few random thoughts.
Esther’s last two days before her disappearance interest me. On the 21/11 she thanks Dan for “ALL the messages to get me going” apparently receiving them as she prepares to leave the motorvan. Why did Dan feel he had to micromanage when she left? If this was HER trip, why besiege a capable adult woman to start...when DAN fedls she must? I find this interesting.
So she gets on her way, hitching, and faithfully keeps him informed. She reaches the Pic and checks in. Then in early afternoon she sets off again..but back toward the Cabana de la Besurtas.
Now, according to Dan...
‘Spends the night alone at Cabana de la Besurtas on the Spanish side (Esther had no phone signal once she left the peak, but she confirmed this the following day when she returned to Pic de Sauvegarde0’
Was this an excuse for no contact for over 24 hours?
Do we know independently that there is no phone signal between the Pic and the Cabana de la Besurtas? Esther had informed him...incorrectly...about the signal from the Refuge going forward on the French side, so are we sure he isn’t just relying on a similar misstatement?
From early afternoon till late afternoon the next day, we have no information about how she spends those hours. I’m curious if she was just seeking some quiet time, without his texts urging her to get going on HIS timetable. Or feeling controlled from afar. Or time to consider her fears, worries, etc without interruption or emotional pressure. Just speculating because we can’t know unless witnesses come forward. IMO Dan does not know either. The last texts and very short conversation probably did not afford time for any details.
This is a woman who seems to often rise at dawn, with many superb sunrise photos. Yet there is quite some time unaccounted for between arriving the night before at the Cabana and reaching the Pic in late afternoon the next day. And in that time she was seemingly alone with her thoughts.
My rambling thoughts and opinions only...
No we haven’t heard it from Esther. We’ve heard this stuff about ‘taking a break’ from a tabloid newspaper!!
I felt more at ease with the discussion about oats, pepper and lettuce.![]()
IMO this was a tragic incident. If Esther had wanted to leave her partner, even to disappear and start a new life, she had every opportunity to do so in a less dramatic manner.
Ask her mother for money if she needed it, stay in the campervan and inform her family and the police that she was OK and did not want to be found. Get a new phone number and be done.
Nothing in what I have read about Esther strikes me as cruel or desperate, and IMO whatever may have happened to her, she would not have wished this anguish about her disappearance on anyone.
Very sorry for your loss @BobbleBob, hope that this thread isn't too close to home for you at times.
Yes I echo that, sorry to read about your loss @BobbleBob
We are discussing a disappearance that even, in Dan’s opinion, is befuddling if not downright mysterious.
Dan seems to have a great deal of confidence in the totality and efficiency of the search and he has equal confidence in Esther’s abilities to handle all aspects of this trek. My interpretation of his dossier is that he rules out voluntary disappearance, is very doubtful of an accident, and favors a third party criminal possibility.
Using the limited information that any of us have, we all are debating the merits of each scenario. We each rank those possibilities as we find them, but we cannot rule any out. We have discussed alternative routes and the dangers inherent in those routes.We have discussed Dan’s suggestion of hunters with guns. We have discussed animals bumping her off trails.
And yes, especially since Esther’s blog offers a great deal of personal information of her emotional struggles, we have parsed her words. I think that’s just as legitimate as looking at alternative routes and all the rest...because this disappearance could well be the result of her emotional state.
It’s a tragic possibility but it’s an undeniable possibility.
Now we have had at least two articles, which seem to indicate that one source of Esther’s reoccurring despair is a deterioration of the relationship. IMO, that possibility is no more off track than looking at alternative routes and chamois and hunters.
I’m certain that the Investigators feel they must pursue it as well. And we each can make up our own minds as to it’s possible value.
Thanks both for your kind words, I’m probably an oddball as I find this thread fascinating some lots of incredible work and sleuthing from people on here.
Since yesterday, people were curious why we were discussing Esther's state of mind and the effects of diet/hiking on it, I"m curious why we are now discussing her relationship.
How would a desire to either take a break from DC or not take a break from DC impact what ED did after she left the peak?
Why would she not eventually return to her van, her writing projects, etc.? There's no reason to suspect that "taking a break" means "running away and hiding."
As to Esther's supposed dependency on their "brand," I think she did step out into a new direction with the children's books, which are not dependent on van life or their brand.
Sorry, but I think there are a lot of unfair and judgemental assumptions here about DC and the relationship.
This is all getting way off track.