stmarysmead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,302
- Reaction score
- 16,930
I believe it’s just a consequence of having so little real information combined with at least one investigator expressing doubts that she was still “on the mountain” or a victim of an accident or a bear.I stand corrected, partially.
I’ll rephrase the point I was trying to make tactfully, while attempting to remain within WS TOS:
Is there a *valid* reason why people are speculating about the dates (19th) some of Esther’s posts/photos were/may have been uploaded to IG & FB when there is LE confirmation that she was seen alive and in person after the date (19th) which seems to be causing “controversy”?
I.e. Is there any evidence admissible according to WS standards that dates of postings may have been manipulated to pre-date them?
So that creates a situation where we look at the those alternative possibilities that are left...and each might involve an attempt to confuse searchers.