Muzikman
ROCKIN!
Did this say they didn't see any heart shaped item?
I haven't actually read them yet... really tiny handwriting, I was serious about having to find my reading glasses. or a magnifying glass.
Did this say they didn't see any heart shaped item?
Did this say they didn't see any heart shaped item?
I'm trying to make out what the heck is written here but not having much success. The handwriting is not too legible (must be an MD). There are some notations about the residence. That really peaks my curiosity!
My mom is a 2nd grade teacher. I'm going to ask her if she can transcribe the doc. She's used to reading all types of handwriting. If she's able to, I'll post it tomorrow.
But, then again, maybe it's just me :waitasec:
Here is another doc I got yesterday that wasn't put up by the media. It is Appendix I from the Motion to Dismiss, titled FBI Laboratory Activity and Communication Log. Handwritten, I haven't actually read them yet, gotta find my reading glasses.
Tony P will apparently be using something in this appendix (and Appendix H, which I thought I had already and will have to go back and get) for his story tonite on Local 6.
http://www.filedropper.com/fbilabcommlog
That is sure what it looked like to me, but then this was very early in the investigation. I wish this was easier to read, but so appreciate the information.
Thanks Muzikman!
ETA However, it does say a heartshaped sticker (about the size of a thumbnail) was found at the home (I think) - not at the scene as I first thought I read. I think it said it was on the back of a picture frame. The notation was made 12/18/08, can anyone else read it better than my old eyes can?
Tony Pipitone's Local 6 report is up now. He focused on page 9316 of this doc and the Heart-shaped sticker.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/21104174/detail.html
From article:
"But Local 6 has obtained a report from the FBI laboratory that reveals all traces of such a shape on the duct tape were destroyed by the FBI lab during a fingerprint-testing process and no photograph of the outline of a heart was taken by the FBI before all traces of it were obliterated.
Some evidence photos have been withheld from public release, so it is not known if any other agency took photos that show an outline of a heart on the tape. But there has been no mention of other such photos in any of the discovery released so far.
Without such an image, a jury will never get to see exactly what was on the duct tape and the size of the outline of the heart cannot be exactly compared to the stickers recovered."
What a bummer!
From article:
"But Local 6 has obtained a report from the FBI laboratory that reveals all traces of such a shape on the duct tape were destroyed by the FBI lab during a fingerprint-testing process and no photograph of the outline of a heart was taken by the FBI before all traces of it were obliterated.
Some evidence photos have been withheld from public release, so it is not known if any other agency took photos that show an outline of a heart on the tape. But there has been no mention of other such photos in any of the discovery released so far.
Without such an image, a jury will never get to see exactly what was on the duct tape and the size of the outline of the heart cannot be exactly compared to the stickers recovered."
What a bummer!
Well, from what I could read...it doesn't really say the FBI destroyed the property. Maybe there's someone better than I that can interpret the information presented here...but this was just a log. The rest is assumption if you ask me. Can someone pinpoint where it says that the FBI destroyed remnants of the sticker area? What I saw was something about "no heart shaped item found"...then something about the nonadhesive side of the tape...so the tape was still obviously there. If there was the outline of a sticker on the tape, I strongly feel that it would have been photographed prior to testing for prints. That makes more sense to me.From article:
"But Local 6 has obtained a report from the FBI laboratory that reveals all traces of such a shape on the duct tape were destroyed by the FBI lab during a fingerprint-testing process and no photograph of the outline of a heart was taken by the FBI before all traces of it were obliterated.
Some evidence photos have been withheld from public release, so it is not known if any other agency took photos that show an outline of a heart on the tape. But there has been no mention of other such photos in any of the discovery released so far.
Without such an image, a jury will never get to see exactly what was on the duct tape and the size of the outline of the heart cannot be exactly compared to the stickers recovered."
What a bummer!
Does the heart sticker make or break this case? I think not. Just shows how F'ed up Casey was.
This also is not intentional destruction of evidence, as Baez is claiming.
Well, from what I could read...it doesn't really say the FBI destroyed the property. Maybe there's someone better than I that can interpret the information presented here...but this was just a log. The rest is assumption if you ask me. Can someone pinpoint where it says that the FBI destroyed remnants of the sticker area? What I saw was something about "no heart shaped item found"...then something about the nonadhesive side of the tape...so the tape was still obviously there. If there was the outline of a sticker on the tape, I strongly feel that it would have been photographed prior to testing for prints. That makes more sense to me.
From the article (my bold) "But Local 6 has obtained a report from the FBI laboratory that reveals all traces of such a shape on the duct tape were destroyed by the FBI lab during a fingerprint-testing process and no photograph of the outline of a heart was taken by the FBI before all traces of it were obliterated."
I don't believe it implies at all that the FBI destroyed anything but rather that the heart shaped adhesive outline was obliterated (inadvertently) during the fingerprinting process (if I am interpreting it correctly.)
ETA: Wondering if this is a case of a poor choice of words ("destroyed") i.e., not entirely accurate in describing what transpired.
Over and over and over again! We have disected,argued and read between the lines.Still,it's not enough.We want more! Cuz we are Websleuths :woohoo:
True. And it's not as if it compromised the remains in any way. If any thing, it might help Casey out a bit, so I don't know why Baez is whining about this. Also, didn't the article say it was unknown if another agency might have photographed the heart adhesive before the fingerprint test was done? So there is always that possibility.
I'm a little confused. The way I am reading this, the tech saw a heart, then she began dusting the tape for fingerprints but when she was done dusting for prints the heart was no longer visible.
But would the adhesive on the tape hold fingerprint powder better than smooth tape? And even if it somehow got wiped off, wouldn't there still be residue on the tape? I guess that is unless some chemical used in the process acted as a tape remover and dissolved the adhesive?
I think this is where JB was headed all along and what he has been fussing about. Anyway I don't see this as a deal breaker (My opinion only.) They just won't be able to include it in the trial unless the defense brings it up. The state has to allow the defense to test any evidence they are going to show at trial. Since they can't find the heart I think the worst thing that will happen is that it can't be brought up at trial. But the defense might bring it up at trial, as evidence of shoddy testing, in which case the state should be able to talk about it then.
It happens at times that there is an insufficent amount of a sample to allow for both the state and the defense to conduct tests. Ex. used to be the bloodstains sometimes couldn't be tested if they were very small because the test would use up the sample and the defense couldn't conduct their own tests. That doesn't happen as much now because they can do testing with extremely small amounts of blood.