Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I totally agree.
Yes, I understand that. But I don't see that it was as prejudicial as the defense would have it.
In listening to the deposition of BC has anyone heard or remember hearing anything nice he said regarding Nancy? Was it a remark re Nancy as his wife, as a mother, a friend?
I felt like the big fight was for nothing.. seemed irrelevant and I can understand that maybe the just wanted to skip over it but it's not going to make or break their opinion about him. Waste of time imo.
In listening to the deposition of BC has anyone heard or remember hearing anything nice he said regarding Nancy? Was it a remark re Nancy as his wife, as a mother, a friend?
Hi,
I'm watching the depositions on WRAL, though I saw them once before a year ago or so.
Looking forward to learning more.
If the judge tells you to do something and you don't do it you should be yelled at, end of story.
In listening to the deposition of BC has anyone heard or remember hearing anything nice he said regarding Nancy? Was it a remark re Nancy as his wife, as a mother, a friend?
I don't think he thought he would get arrested, just look at him and listen to him. I think he was thinking they would have arrested him by now.
In listening to the deposition of BC has anyone heard or remember hearing anything nice he said regarding Nancy? Was it a remark re Nancy as his wife, as a mother, a friend?
Right.. but my point had nothing to do with that.
Yes, I understand that. But I don't see that it was as prejudicial as the defense would have it.
Your point was that it was no big deal. If I had never listened to the depo before and I heard he contacted an ex-girlfriend/fiancee a few weeks prior, I would think that's a pretty sleazy thing to do since his wife recently died. Without the foundation as to the reason why he contacted the girl, I don't see how you can't understand why the defense would have a problem with that.
If the defense had did that same thing (playing something that was prejudicial to the jury) I can't imagine the number of posts on here that would be going crazy over that.