Except for the fact that Unity, voicemail system, could be used to trigger an automated call based upon a configurable delay timer. The length of the call is dependent upon the length of the voicemail. If such a system existed in the house then this system is quite independent of any Cisco system and thus no records would be seen on Cisco network. Could the Unity system be installed on a hard drive that existed in the powered off desktop? yes. Could the hard drive have been disposed of? yes. Does BC have the knowledge and accessibility to such gear? yes. Was the gear found in the house? no! Does this mean then that it is not possible?
:goodpost:
I think this was an awesome post Albert. Spot-on in my book.
While BC does not have to prove his innocence, and the state does have to prove him guilty there is no stronger evidence than the phone calls while he was known to be at HT that would prove his innocence.
Since those calls are so convenient about showing her still alive while he is obviously elsewhere, they do bear very close scrutny. I am leaning towards the calls being spoofed, and NC being on Fielding Drive long before the calls took place. I am still not 100% convinced, and I would love to find that he had not completed erased all of the tracks, but there are quite a few things about his movements and actions of the weekend that do not quite tally for me.
I have not heard a lot of support for him being all that great of a guy, so I can lay that aside for a bit, although it could, along with the Sep Agreement form something of a motive.
Now that I think about it, if NC were not deceased by 6:30 - 7:00, he might well have been better off leaving her at home and selling the story that someone entered the house while he was away, but he was pretty busy that morning and creative storytelling might not be his strong suit. Personally, I think TOD was long before 6:00, more like 1:00 to 4:00.
Hearing some argue that the calls could not have been spoofed because there was no equipment in the house when the warrant was issued is a pretty high bar to clear for evidence. It is like saying if the gun found in the house is not still smoking, there is no basis for charges. It defies logic if you surmise that all the cleaning done that morning was to cover evidence, that he would not also dispose of something that could tie him into a method for covering the calls that were supposedly made by NC that morning.
I recently took a statistics course. When you are calculating probabilities you add up all of the parts of whatever you are trying to determine.
So, it becomes very statistically unlikely that any one person is killed in a given day, and goes further down the list as you go through the alibi.
