Mr FBI COMPUTER FORENSIC PHYSICIST?
He is not doing a forensic analysis. He is reviewing security logs. The FBI person would know more about forensics, but I doubt very seriously he understands the security logs at this level.
Mr FBI COMPUTER FORENSIC PHYSICIST?
Now this guy is unethical? You really need to stop attacking this guys character.
Does anyone else wonder if BC isn't responsible for some of the things on this CSA log????? I understand his home computer being vulnerable to others using his home network. Maybe I don't understand this CSA log.
Who said there is bias by the DA in this case?
Just because Kurtz said it's so, doesn't mean it's true.
You are simply wrong. The witness is an expert in what he is currently testifying about. Or else he wouldn't be allowed to testify about it. He is not doing a computer forensic analysis. He's examining security logs and the court has declared him an expert in that field.
The job and responsibility of the DA is to find the truth and equally and fairly dispense justice according to the law, their job is not to bring their egos into work or to just "win." They do not work for the victims, they work for the public at large and are responsible to the public at large. There should be no bias in the DA's office, if they are not able to rid of their bias then they should not be working for the public at large in the DAs office.
Except I looked for the last three days to find a qualified forensic computer analyst regarding this data and was re-directed to the FBI each time to find someone locally with the qualifications.
This is fruit of the poisoned tree and the pros knows it.
Does not sit well with me legally. (Forget BC for a minute)
And for everyone hopping on the judge is biased bandwagon, he is giving the defense and this witness A LOT of leeway in this testimony despite constant objection by the Pros.
Kelly
He's never done forensic work....right?
No, he called himself a professional hacker - and explained the term quite well.
IMO, Mr Kurtz keeps wandering into areas outside the witnesses so called expertise.
You know looking at this log...and realizing I get these notifications all the time that someone or somethings is trying to access my portal ( which is setup as private wireless (and is password protected) does mean they actually entered or planted something on my computer....I think it is the nature of the beast when working on wireles puters...I also get notified when another wifi network becomes available to me and do I want to setup a profile for it....
This log shows nothing other than usual wireless activities to me..
IF defense it attempting to show that something nefarious went on on July 11th, July 14th July15 or July 16th....and IF that happened..whomever did so planted very specific items when no one would have known them except Brad Cooper at that time....
Sorry Not sure if this is going to fly with jurors, after cross exam is done.
As of yesterday afternoon, AFTER the defense motion for mistrial or recusal. I think he had a moment of self-awareness.