WolfpackWoman
Inactive
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 0
So, it has been determined that his interview was with Cary LE, or BC's attorneys?
Cary PD--Detective Dismukes to be specific.
So, it has been determined that his interview was with Cary LE, or BC's attorneys?
In early affidavits, he stated that they were naked on the sofa in Nancy's house but he didn't remember (due to drinking) if there was an actual sexual encounter or not. I have read, too, that Nancy said the same thing before she was killed--no memory. He may say something different today, or in the taped interview, but the 'don't remember' by both is what's showing in the affidavits from early on.
So, it has been determined that his interview was with Cary LE, or BC's attorneys?
BC was doing the nasty with this guys wife wasn't he?
She got to quite a few men in the area. BC was one of them, though certainly not the last. She was (or maybe still is) with this current witness (JP) as well. Broke up his marriage.
If I walk in on my teenage daughter naked on the couch with a a guy, despite what they can "remember", you best believe that it will be treated like a sexual encounter.
The BDI-ers have such enormous double standards. BC could smile at another woman and you'd call him a serial cheater but no matter what NC did if it can't be played out to make her look saintly then it's all gossip and hearsay.
I thought before not remembering his sexual encounter with NC, this guy also didn't remember being naked with her, and pretty much before that told CPD he barely knew them.
I know, these relationships are bizarre, which is why I dubbed it "Swingtown". But I have to disagree on SH being "creepy". I think he's hot, and I cannot believe his wife cheated on hottie with BC. Ewwww!
It was a 'sexual encounter'. This is witness testimony, no need for interpretation. You can spin it however you want, it's no different from BC and HM in the closet as far as adultery goes.
I haven't been following as closely as some, but I heard Kurtz say this is the exact same situation that the pros put the defense in, except then it was a 6 hour video the night before, and not a 1-hour video. Correct?
Both JP and NC say they don't remember what, exactly, happened that night. I read in something that she owned up to their being naked on the sofa but she didn't think there was a true sexual act involved.
Thanks! Sometimes, I am reading along and feel like I'm watching and listening to a different trial than almost everyone else! In my simple world, it is creepy, odd, strange...whatever...for this guy to be bff with BC after BC had sex with this guys wife!! :banghead:
Yeah right. So she's not having sex with BC at this time, she ends up on a couch naked with another man, who I assume is more than willing and eager to fulfill her desires and nothing happens.
uh huh, see, I'm thinking it more closely resembles BC & HM in the car, or perhaps BC & HM when HM was giving BC the BJ. Because as someone else had pointed out, one would think they'd *remember* intercourse. Now perhaps JP didn't really recall a BJ, and it didn't result in much because they were both so inebrieated??? What's a good two letter description for 'drunk as skunks?'
In BC's depo I remember him saying SH didn't learn about the encounter BC had with HM until about a month before. Meaning a month before the depo was taken, which would mean SH learned about the affair Sept 08. Now we know Mr Cupper lies, but that's what he claimed in his depo. If that's true, or if SH didn't know the full extent as to what happened until after July '08, you can't blame him for being supportive of BC in July 08.
On the stand, didn't SH testify that he had heard a rumor of his wife being with BC, but it wasn't confirmed until NC went missing?
I could be wrong. It's all very strange indeed.
Don't kill the messenger
This is what they said in the affidavits.