Not necessarily in his possession. He could have accessed it through his VPN tunnel from home.
Nope. The log has an ethernet address.
If it knows the MAC address, it was connected directly via ethernet.
Not necessarily in his possession. He could have accessed it through his VPN tunnel from home.
It won't be.
So in other words, you don't really care about the truth of the matter? Brad said he was asleep at 9:30 pm. at the latest, and didn't arise before 4:00 a.m., yet there are increasingly numerous reports of Brad being on computer/s during that time period.
i suspect that this router issue is as follows:
they have the requisition where BC ordered this equipment for the lab. Since it's Cisco's equipment, then they have the MAC address they shipped to fulfill their own internal order.
if the MAC address transits itself as part of the VPN logon (i.e. this computer is logging on via this router - both MAC's sent) this this is a critical piece of information and brings another smoking gun, IMO.
This, also IMO, would bring the jury back to guilty.
Is Greg M "suspiciously thirsty guy?" If so, the court will need a brief recess to bring in extra water.
How can this Chris Frye now be allowed to examine the forensic evidence from the laptop when the Def. Witness could not.
Nope... he is the one that the defendant said was his best friend at work, during his depo.
The witness (GM) found that kinda flattering (or something like that) when he heard the defendant had said that that about him.
GM also went to lunch and walked out of work that night with the defendant on Fri, July 11th
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/nancycooper/video/9404332/#/vid9404332
He's being asked to read on entry in one log.
The entry is about a network connection to a Cisco box.
Did everyone lose their feed?
Nope. The log has an ethernet address.
If it knows the MAC address, it was connected directly via ethernet.