State v Bradley Cooper 5-3-11

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I ever get arrested, my first call goes to Trenkle!
 
Here's Trenkle (full minus sound went out portion):

You are to maintain BC innocent unless proc entirely convinced and fully satisfied you G beyond reasonable doubt...BC innocent now as when trial started.

No blood, no fluids, no fibers, no evidence.

They searched car, seized items inside outside, free reign to grab anything, result? No blood, no fluids, no fibers, no evidence.

they said car trunk show room clean, SBI agents said it had dirt and debris with it - consistent with vacuuming 2 weeks before, not days before.

SBI - no blood or body fluids in trunk, tested with all equipment.

Fibers: SBi asked to test rug from Cooper floor...sent by CPD to lab, SBI tested rug, no blood, no fluids

They want you to believe body rolled up in that rug in the trunk - no fibers from rug in trunk, no trunk fibers on rug

next they want sheets checked (keeping with their car-body-trunk transfer theory)

SBI looked at sheet and did find fibers...there is physical evidence...just none that implicate BC...

No evidence NC body ever in the trunk.

Finally 2011 check fiber from trunk against sports bra, throrough check every combo - NO FIBER, fibers in bra do not match trunk.

Body was never in the trunk - that's the physical evidence.

Evidence in the house, nothing out of ordinary seen outside the house agent looks in trash - nothing out of ordinary, he looks in vaccum cleaner bag - ordinary, no blood on wasjher surface, nothing out of ordinary in garage - nothing, mayt in garage no blood, upstairs...MBR checks bathrooms, sheets, floors, no blood no bodily fluids.

he tests baseboard, no blood no bodily fluids.

Are you entirely convinced? fully satisfied BC is guilty? NO

They took item untested - mens shirt, shown to you almost sertainly a rust stain.

What did they test?
rug...no blood/fluid
bed...apparently CPD can conduct a visual test 15 hours later to determine if it was slept in

CPD police-land of BC-is-guilty assume pillowcase removed nefarious, not child spilling something on it

Green dress - they said he hid it, I bet if you took a poll of any man in this room you would not find one who remembers what his wife wore to work this morning let alnoe partynight before admist what happened next day.

Why didn't he hide dress then? its out in the open hanging out of a basket?

DD said he tried to fool me with colors, but BC was overheard asking what color dress, she answered black.
BC figured out right dress, they said they are sure he washed it.

SBI agent looked inside dress - signed of powdered deordorant = was not washed. There was a seeped through grease-like stain. She tested stani, comsistent with food stain.

House, car, everywhere tested - no blood/fluid

Are you entirely convince? or do you have a reasonable doubt?

Tire tracks and footprints...

diagram done by agent Hill, great tire track which leads right to where body is drew diagram that night when fresh in his mind.

then he downplayed in testimony, but pointed out he thought report and diagram was important at the time.

We know the murderer was there - as the seem, of course important.

wasn't a utility truck backing up to there

is consistent w/someone bringing body and dumping it

track do not match BC or NC car...3' 11", BC wasn't out there.

Footprints?

see that footprint (chart) right near the head of body.

Det Y said could have been EMS, no reason for EMS to go around to there - only killer draggin body by sports bra and planting feet...you can tell by footprint not size 13...it was wet in that ditch, rained over an inch ...footprint was left there..

Not BC footprint - that is evidence.

cig butt & wire

could have tested wire for DNA, they said 'well its a construction site'...if they had tested wire and had NC DNA then it wasn't BC because acrrding to CPD he killed her at house.

tested cig butt in 2011, asked what can make it go away? she sadi age can do that...where did it sit for 2.5 years? CPD evidence room...do you really believe that if BC smoked they would not have tested that cig butt?

soil.

first, she said you need to chemically analyze...i.e. 2 properties side by side could be different soil. So what do they do? take one pair of shoes out of the house only pair they check...where did they get the soil? BC next door neighbor, no BC yard. Why? because person now in Cooper home wasn't there couldn't wait 2 hours - took neighbors soil.

Did they test anywhere else he went with those shoes before testing? no

Can;t tell mica by sight, needs chem analysis - high mag/low mag mica, high mag mica=lake lochemere, not crime scene, low mag mica=lake lochmere or lake johnson, not crime scene...but she then says we found trace element white mice (found all over the state)...didn't you say you can't tell by sight?

They said we couldn't find shoes BC was wearing that morning..no soil match is why not interested.

insect guy 2010 he analyzed the insects which were almost all dead...amazing conclusion they were laid 11Am 7/11...CPD said "no no, please recheck"...then he comes up with too late on 7/12, then changed to 5Am...then dr admit no confidence in time estimates, based on only 2 dead bugs = no confidence in test.

eggs could have been laid at noon on 7/12? expert said yes...essentially his testimony is meaningless

Are you entirely convinced? fully satisfied? no BC is not guilty.

ME Butts.

1) said stomach contents empty, length for digestion...creates problem for prosecution, then want you to believe NC was killed after midnight to 1:30. She cooked and ate ribs, told someone else she had eaten her salad. What makes more sense? that she left party went home went to sleep went out running

-sound cut out-

what makes more sense she had caffiene before running? yes.

talk about NC BAC, supports she was alive through the night


They want you to believe in the middle of the night BC took body to dump site...even with the extra patrols in lochmere due to van reported.

License plates removed? guranateed to be stopped by police...that and presence of extra patrols.

According to CPD BC would have to dump body, get rid of certain clothing, slept in bed, go to HT, get rid of big router, no one person saw BC somewhere unusual.

14 ppl thought they saw NC (called CPD), BC's pic all over the papers, but not one single call to report seeing BC doing anything that night - or dumped clothes or equipment.

4 ppl saw van in 36 hour period, not one person saw anything unusual re: BC

painting story: we know from MH, LH and RT that she was there and agreed BC/Mh would play tennis the next morning. RT clearly has no reason to dispute that. LH and N's own sister say she was tired of painting...no one heard any mention of NC painting w/JS next morning, but there are ppl heard NC was going running.

Reasonable doubt, not guilty.

No violence by BC, no one ever saw him violent. never threatened NC or laid a hand on her. NC cloests friends said she was not afraid of BC.

marital problems go back to 2001, did they have them in 2007? yes...things deteriorated after HM admission, affair and lying about it was wrong, but he's not ontrial for that.

They want you to believe it was not just a bad marriage but an abusive one. Her new friends took her stories and believed them...but we know 2 ppl NC was less than credible with she should have been (her father re: pay BC in cash - gary Beard said no one paid then, they paid late every time)...she lied to father. She told own divorce lawyer she never had affair.

make her a bad person? no, but just like any one of us not 100% completely honest.

After she realized BC didn't leave allowance afternoon of 7/11 then it becomes an issue - allowance cut stories etc..

We know she said nothing to hillers, own attorney...no abuse, that BC trying to be a good father bugging NC.

Evidence that BC see emails for NC, that was wrong - but ppl do that in a divorce, but after April wouldn't you expect to see a bunch of emails between NC and atty? none...one phone call may 4th...calling about affair/alimony, next phone call when "everything getting desparate" was june 4 - 3 minutes...No desparate situation...talking about divorce but trying to figure out where to go next.

Evidence she called RE she needed to get out ASAP, but then invites Hillers over for game night?

There is evidence and there is speculation,

Evidence: Ht vids, receipts, call
Speculation: anything else suggested he did with no evidence

CPD red flags

tech-guy and non-tech-guy...called subpeona compliance ppl (not normally who you talk to for tech support) doesn't take notes. Does test on a sat afternoon at 5:00 - strange time to do this test, no one else around. Wipes phone and SIM card and then replaces the evidence.

if you call sears and get customer service people they tell you flip a switch, you do it smoke comes out...you unplug it then what? you don;t just walk away from it and deal with it in a couple of months?

NO, you call back Sears (ATT) and complain - tell them what happened...you all messed up my homicide evidence!..you are angry...didn't happen.

No info on search warrent (issued after phone wiped) that he erased phone. I know this is a red flag.

I know its a red flag re JP...they didn't investigate him, they went out 2 years later to tell him defense might be coming to check on you you better make sure you have an alibi.

What else do we know? they are inside the house no booties, gloves, drinking diet coke, computer on for hours.

When they have a theory and its wrong they just drop it and change it to a different guilty...never thought maybe BC innocent.

Said BC was lying because he got tide and they only use All. wrong.

Claimed there is a struggles in the house (he is taking out ducks) ducks are broken evidence destroyed...Cummings said to Mrs. C you made our witnesses look like liars...no they did it themselves.

last point, suspicious van..I don;t know its role, but pretty damn suspicious - she sees a van heading into a culdesac fielding 7/11 lights off. Sometime after midnight doorbell ring other house - don't know why someone was trying to get in, but our lights were out. 3 police cars show up why? he is concerned someone who might do something.

next morning somewhere around 7 AM RZ says she sees NC running - inmteresting same route JP said either NC told him or that he believes take you pick...RZ believes its NC.

Sgt hayes saw jogger...hidges sees a van coming toward him passing a jogger towards him 90% its NC, see van head back to her.

Van seen at end of fielding 7/13 fitting hidges description. incredible coincidence? should have been investigated.

no one saw BC out there but several saw van in area.

For 2 years I have had responsibility of BC, in a few short hours that responsibility will pass to you. you have the power of another person's life. i ask you, in the days and the weeks ahead you may reflect on case - i ask you, if you have any doubts have them NOW not then. Hold pros to the wall, because they cannot meet this burden ask you to return NG.
 
I think I'm in love with Trenkle!

Not me, I had to bow out again. His voice turned to gravel, sounded more frightening or leery IMO. Don't like that gravel voice. He was okay in the beginning. At least I got a bunch more stuff done.
 
She could have thrown up at home.

And she could have thrown up and left bodily fluids in the car she was murdered and /or transported in. Oh wait, the CPD did not find that car or even look for it.

Maybe, the fluids were in the hit man's car that Brad hired. Or maybe in the helicopter BC rented to dump NC's body.

In any case I find it amusing that we are now being offered new theories of the crime just after the defense has completely shattered all the old ones.....
 
Here's Trenkle (full minus sound went out portion):

You are to maintain BC innocent unless proc entirely convinced and fully satisfied you G beyond reasonable doubt...BC innocent now as when trial started.

No blood, no fluids, no fibers, no evidence.

They searched car, seized items inside outside, free reign to grab anything, result? No blood, no fluids, no fibers, no evidence.

they said car trunk show room clean, SBI agents said it had dirt and debris with it - consistent with vacuuming 2 weeks before, not days before.

SBI - no blood or body fluids in trunk, tested with all equipment.

Fibers: SBi asked to test rug from Cooper floor...sent by CPD to lab, SBI tested rug, no blood, no fluids

They want you to believe body rolled up in that rug in the trunk - no fibers from rug in trunk, no trunk fibers on rug

next they want sheets checked (keeping with their car-body-trunk transfer theory)

SBI looked at sheet and did find fibers...there is physical evidence...just none that implicate BC...

No evidence NC body ever in the trunk.

Finally 2011 check fiber from trunk against sports bra, throrough check every combo - NO FIBER, fibers in bra do not match trunk.

Body was never in the trunk - that's the physical evidence.

Evidence in the house, nothing out of ordinary seen outside the house agent looks in trash - nothing out of ordinary, he looks in vaccum cleaner bag - ordinary, no blood on wasjher surface, nothing out of ordinary in garage - nothing, mayt in garage no blood, upstairs...MBR checks bathrooms, sheets, floors, no blood no bodily fluids.

he tests baseboard, no blood no bodily fluids.

Are you entirely convinced? fully satisfied BC is guilty? NO

They took item untested - mens shirt, shown to you almost sertainly a rust stain.

What did they test?
rug...no blood/fluid
bed...apparently CPD can conduct a visual test 15 hours later to determine if it was slept in

CPD police-land of BC-is-guilty assume pillowcase removed nefarious, not child spilling something on it

Green dress - they said he hid it, I bet if you took a poll of any man in this room you would not find one who remembers what his wife wore to work this morning let alnoe partynight before admist what happened next day.

Why didn't he hide dress then? its out in the open hanging out of a basket?

DD said he tried to fool me with colors, but BC was overheard asking what color dress, she answered black.
BC figured out right dress, they said they are sure he washed it.

SBI agent looked inside dress - signed of powdered deordorant = was not washed. There was a seeped through grease-like stain. She tested stani, comsistent with food stain.

House, car, everywhere tested - no blood/fluid

Are you entirely convince? or do you have a reasonable doubt?

Tire tracks and footprints...

diagram done by agent Hill, great tire track which leads right to where body is drew diagram that night when fresh in his mind.

then he downplayed in testimony, but pointed out he thought report and diagram was important at the time.

We know the murderer was there - as the seem, of course important.

wasn't a utility truck backing up to there

is consistent w/someone bringing body and dumping it

track do not match BC or NC car...3' 11", BC wasn't out there.

Footprints?

see that footprint (chart) right near the head of body.

Det Y said could have been EMS, no reason for EMS to go around to there - only killer draggin body by sports bra and planting feet...you can tell by footprint not size 13...it was wet in that ditch, rained over an inch ...footprint was left there..

Not BC footprint - that is evidence.

cig butt & wire

could have tested wire for DNA, they said 'well its a construction site'...if they had tested wire and had NC DNA then it wasn't BC because acrrding to CPD he killed her at house.

tested cig butt in 2011, asked what can make it go away? she sadi age can do that...where did it sit for 2.5 years? CPD evidence room...do you really believe that if BC smoked they would not have tested that cig butt?

soil.

first, she said you need to chemically analyze...i.e. 2 properties side by side could be different soil. So what do they do? take one pair of shoes out of the house only pair they check...where did they get the soil? BC next door neighbor, no BC yard. Why? because person now in Cooper home wasn't there couldn't wait 2 hours - took neighbors soil.

Did they test anywhere else he went with those shoes before testing? no

Can;t tell mica by sight, needs chem analysis - high mag/low mag mica, high mag mica=lake lochemere, not crime scene, low mag mica=lake lochmere or lake johnson, not crime scene...but she then says we found trace element white mice (found all over the state)...didn't you say you can't tell by sight?

They said we couldn't find shoes BC was wearing that morning..no soil match is why not interested.

insect guy 2010 he analyzed the insects which were almost all dead...amazing conclusion they were laid 11Am 7/11...CPD said "no no, please recheck"...then he comes up with too late on 7/12, then changed to 5Am...then dr admit no confidence in time estimates, based on only 2 dead bugs = no confidence in test.

eggs could have been laid at noon on 7/12? expert said yes...essentially his testimony is meaningless

Are you entirely convinced? fully satisfied? no BC is not guilty.

ME Butts.

1) said stomach contents empty, length for digestion...creates problem for prosecution, then want you to believe NC was killed after midnight to 1:30. She cooked and ate ribs, told someone else she had eaten her salad. What makes more sense? that she left party went home went to sleep went out running

-sound cut out-

what makes more sense she had caffiene before running? yes.

talk about NC BAC, supports she was alive through the night


They want you to believe in the middle of the night BC took body to dump site...even with the extra patrols in lochmere due to van reported.

License plates removed? guranateed to be stopped by police...that and presence of extra patrols.

According to CPD BC would have to dump body, get rid of certain clothing, slept in bed, go to HT, get rid of big router, no one person saw BC somewhere unusual.

14 ppl thought they saw NC (called CPD), BC's pic all over the papers, but not one single call to report seeing BC doing anything that night - or dumped clothes or equipment.

4 ppl saw van in 36 hour period, not one person saw anything unusual re: BC

painting story: we know from MH, LH and RT that she was there and agreed BC/Mh would play tennis the next morning. RT clearly has no reason to dispute that. LH and N's own sister say she was tired of painting...no one heard any mention of NC painting w/JS next morning, but there are ppl heard NC was going running.

Reasonable doubt, not guilty.

No violence by BC, no one ever saw him violent. never threatened NC or laid a hand on her. NC cloests friends said she was not afraid of BC.

marital problems go back to 2001, did they have them in 2007? yes...things deteriorated after HM admission, affair and lying about it was wrong, but he's not ontrial for that.

They want you to believe it was not just a bad marriage but an abusive one. Her new friends took her stories and believed them...but we know 2 ppl NC was less than credible with she should have been (her father re: pay BC in cash - gary Beard said no one paid then, they paid late every time)...she lied to father. She told own divorce lawyer she never had affair.

make her a bad person? no, but just like any one of us not 100% completely honest.

After she realized BC didn't leave allowance afternoon of 7/11 then it becomes an issue - allowance cut stories etc..

We know she said nothing to hillers, own attorney...no abuse, that BC trying to be a good father bugging NC.

Evidence that BC see emails for NC, that was wrong - but ppl do that in a divorce, but after April wouldn't you expect to see a bunch of emails between NC and atty? none...one phone call may 4th...calling about affair/alimony, next phone call when "everything getting desparate" was june 4 - 3 minutes...No desparate situation...talking about divorce but trying to figure out where to go next.

Evidence she called RE she needed to get out ASAP, but then invites Hillers over for game night?

There is evidence and there is speculation,

Evidence: Ht vids, receipts, call
Speculation: anything else suggested he did with no evidence

CPD red flags

tech-guy and non-tech-guy...called subpeona compliance ppl (not normally who you talk to for tech support) doesn't take notes. Does test on a sat afternoon at 5:00 - strange time to do this test, no one else around. Wipes phone and SIM card and then replaces the evidence.

if you call sears and get customer service people they tell you flip a switch, you do it smoke comes out...you unplug it then what? you don;t just walk away from it and deal with it in a couple of months?

NO, you call back Sears (ATT) and complain - tell them what happened...you all messed up my homicide evidence!..you are angry...didn't happen.

No info on search warrent (issued after phone wiped) that he erased phone. I know this is a red flag.

I know its a red flag re JP...they didn't investigate him, they went out 2 years later to tell him defense might be coming to check on you you better make sure you have an alibi.

What else do we know? they are inside the house no booties, gloves, drinking diet coke, computer on for hours.

When they have a theory and its wrong they just drop it and change it to a different guilty...never thought maybe BC innocent.

Said BC was lying because he got tide and they only use All. wrong.

Claimed there is a struggles in the house (he is taking out ducks) ducks are broken evidence destroyed...Cummings said to Mrs. C you made our witnesses look like liars...no they did it themselves.

last point, suspicious van..I don;t know its role, but pretty damn suspicious - she sees a van heading into a culdesac fielding 7/11 lights off. Sometime after midnight doorbell ring other house - don't know why someone was trying to get in, but our lights were out. 3 police cars show up why? he is concerned someone who might do something.

next morning somewhere around 7 AM RZ says she sees NC running - inmteresting same route JP said either NC told him or that he believes take you pick...RZ believes its NC.

Sgt hayes saw jogger...hidges sees a van coming toward him passing a jogger towards him 90% its NC, see van head back to her.

Van seen at end of fielding 7/13 fitting hidges description. incredible coincidence? should have been investigated.

no one saw BC out there but several saw van in area.

For 2 years I have had responsibility of BC, in a few short hours that responsibility will pass to you. you have the power of another person's life. i ask you, in the days and the weeks ahead you may reflect on case - i ask you, if you have any doubts have them NOW not then. Hold pros to the wall, because they cannot meet this burden ask you to return NG.

He kept following up each point with 'are you convinced yet?'

Great job with the recap.
 
You think Cummings and BZ can match those 2 closings? esp Trenkle? NFW
 
wral WRAL NEWS in NC
#CooperTrial jury taking 1 hour break. Prosecutors present closing arguments next.
1 minute ago
»
WRAL NEWS in NC
wral WRAL NEWS in NC
Trenkle: I ask you to return the only fair and just verdict in this case: not guilty. #coopertrial
 
Not me, I had to bow out again. His voice turned to gravel, sounded more frightening or leery IMO. Don't like that gravel voice. He was okay in the beginning. At least I got a bunch more stuff done.

I have been totally glued to both Kurtz and Trenkle. I wanted to see if they twisted anything around. Not much.
Are you going to watch the prosecution's closing? Hope so.
 
I'm pretty sure at least one person at that party would testify to that.

As an alcoholic (no longer drink), I used to throw up at parties and no one ever knew unless I told someone. One who drinks excessively typically does not share those details with anyone. From my experience.
 
You think Cummings and BZ can match those 2 closings? esp Trenkle? NFW

"NFW" LOL

I'm so using that

I honestly think this case will be won/lost in closing arguments. The last few months almost seem like a waste compared to the Defense's closing argument
 
Not really. I honestly have gotten sick at a dinner party and no one ever knew. We just left a little early.

I don't think she did because the state would be all over that theory if they believed it.
 
And she could have thrown up and left bodily fluids in the car she was murdered and /or transported in. Oh wait, the CPD did not find that car or even look for it.

Maybe, the fluids were in the hit man's car that Brad hired. Or maybe in the helicopter BC rented to dump NC's body.

In any case I find it amusing that we are now being offered new theories of the crime just after the defense has completely shattered all the old ones.....

LOL not my intent Shadow or anyone elses I'm sure. Jurors can think about those things. I offer no other theory. BC speaks for himself without talking. Especially to his inlaws in the early stages and after. Oh and maybe they are in the mysterious van.
 
Attack the law.
Attack the evidence.
Attack the witness.

All bases covered. Amazing how everyone is lying, including the victim, just to get BC.

Just an observation. I have NO decision yet on if the pros has proved their case. I'll have to see how strong their closing is.

JMHO
fran
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
239
Guests online
1,777
Total visitors
2,016

Forum statistics

Threads
606,740
Messages
18,209,987
Members
233,949
Latest member
dirkmoody
Back
Top