yeknomaras
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 1
these witnesses don't seem to like the state much lol
I have a maroon van <Wally>. Should I be worried?
I have a maroon van <Wally>. Should I be worried?
I think defense is using this testimony (and the previous - taken collectively) to focus on how fast CPD zeroed in on BC to the exclusion of investigating any other possibilities. I don't think they are trying to tie it all into a single theory. Isn't this apparent?
Yes, 'Be Worried'....'Very Worried'
I really love this women's drawl accent...Its neat!!
She saw two ladies jogging Sat AM after 7AM...clothing doesnt resemble Nancy..two left shoes and naked....Too bad she wasnt on her front porch in the middle of the night..could have seen Brad do his deposit on Fielding..
Here's yet another van with two hispanics leaning on it...(13/07/08)..
Reported to police...surprise surprise..the Bad Police didnt followup with her...
My first guess would be, whatever she reported didnt have any relevance to Nancy's case...Man oh Man....
these witnesses don't seem to like the state much lol
It definitely takes two. Didn't realize Iron Man competitions were expensive, but how about the MBA program he was taking? I bet that was SUPER expensive. College ain't cheap. Doubt he qualified for financial aid. I've always thought it quite odd he would buy laundry detergent at Harris Teeter. Unless you're shopping with coupons on triple day then that's not the cheapest place to go. In fact HT is the most expensive (outside of Whole Foods a/k/a Whole paycheck) store in the area.
Why is it that when the prosecution brought up tons of witnesses most people on this board didn't call them "attention seekers", but when defense calls up their witnesses, most everyone calls them "attention seekers"? I find this line of questioning by the defense much more pertinent and interesting that calling up tons of people who told the same story about NC and BC not getting along.
And they did ring the doorbell, they must be Mormons!:floorlaugh:
I think defense is using this testimony (and the previous - taken collectively) to focus on how fast CPD zeroed in on BC to the exclusion of investigating any other possibilities. I don't think they are trying to tie it all into a single theory. Isn't this apparent?
Do we have a time when this man saw this van?..Wasnt Nancy still at the party then?...Interesting testimony..whomever they were likely dumping garbage or other such, or even possibly pilfering equipment or items from the construction site...Happens all the time on construction sites...
This line of questioning is not very helpful except to further their idea of LE's ineptness and poor investigations...
Cross is quickly showing that LE did followup about his sightings that very night...Hummmmm
Excuse me? They were referred to as everything from the cary clique to nosey neighbors, and those were the nicer references.
It was relevant in that it showed people up to something nefarious within the area. Now, do I think the man was crazy after hearing his doorbell ring to then go look out, see nothing, and proceed to open his door anyhow and walk outside, YES, he was. He should have stayed in the house and called the police. What if someone wanted to get inside and rang the doorbell to bring him down to the door, hid, and then when he walked out had attacked him.
I think it's more that they are defensive because of the line of questioning (waiting to be tricked into an answer that shows they are lying or don't have a good memory - when they're really trying to be honest). Just my thought. These are normal people up there and probably really nervous!
Sure that's what they are doing - but so far nothing has shown me that zeroing in on a suspicious, lying, odds on favorite to being her killer was the WRONG thing to do....
Give me a credible alternative - what were those other possibilities?. We don't even have consistent reports of suspicious activity in a common colored van. No other criminal activity, no attempted kidnappings, no men driving around in vans exposing themselves, no assaults, no private stalking of NC where she said she was uncomfortable and she called the police. Nada, zip, zero, zilch. And then explain why someone would kill NC, take her clothing - no sexual assault - and leave her diamond stud earrings. Nothing makes sense and if it doesn't make sense........................