It could be. He also says roughly 75 bags of evidence, so it could be more or less.
I don't think he collected anything like 75 items that would be "evidence" in the sense of being relevant in the trial. 75 things most of which would have nothing to do with anything? Sure, IMO. Showing his bias, he says this 75 bags include evidence that was "either missed or ignored" by LE. How does he know that? How does he know they didn't see it but choose not to collect it - is that not possible? He makes his living trying to discredit LE investigations, so keep that in mind.
Here's what he says, "Dr. Maurice Godwin was a consultant for Jason's family from November 2006 until 2009. Dr. Godwin spent 3 weeks processing the Young crime scene and collected roughly 75 bags of evidence that was either missed or ignored by Wake County Sheriff's Detectives and City/County Bureau of Identification (CCBI)."
I take it he spends his time trying to discredit LE at trial, rather than for example investigating for the purpose of discovering the criminal. That that is who was chosen to canvass the crime scene by the Youngs tells me a lot, IMO.
We'll see, though, he may be convincing if he takes the stand.
Let him speak for himself:
"Services range from helping defense attorneys detect analytical fallacies made by crime scene investigators to trial litigation consultant. Dr. Godwin also can assist attorneys in developing trial strategies, which will diminish the testimony of the oppositions profiling or crime scene expert.
....
Dr. Godwin is experienced at examining thousand of pages of discovery looking for salient facts and information which might appear meaningless but in fact may have a positive impact on a defense case."
There's a term for this sort of expert, but it would not be polite to state it here.
http://www.investigativepsych.com/about/default.html