Not sure I ever heard that entire phone call until now. Wow, one phone call is almost all the jury has to hear to determine the mother of the said missing child does not care at all that her child is "missing"! This mother can't be bothered to discuss it further. The police don't know how to look up ZFG on the computer is the only problem, and its hardly of concern to her. Yeah, sure, LE doesn't know how to do computer searches. Yeah, sure, LE has it out for her to pin this on her. Pin what on her?
So, her child may be alive while she's in jail being questioned, and she doesn't want to talk to even her own family about finding Caylee, or supply any real information to help find her. She's having a hissy fit because she wants to talk to her boyfriend who she states knows nothing about where Caylee is. Lo and behold, defense is now going to say Casey is innocent. Do they expect anyone to believe that?
Please don't tell me any jury listening to that call would have any doubts the mother is guilty of killing her child. Can't imagine the defense, no matter what dazzling stories they come up with, can undo that one crucial phone call. Then, the jury can add up all the other actions of the mother during the time she was "doing her own investigation" trying to find her daughter at clubs and tattoo parlors, even avoiding mentioning her daughter was missing for 31 days.
It's IMPOSSIBLE to believe someone else killed Caylee and dumped her body. Come on, Defense, let's see what feeble evidence you can come up with to support your story that someone else killed/disposed of that precious little girl. IMO, no way, the defense can not spin this to make Casey look innocent of killing her daughter.
What happens if the Defense team doesn't come up with the evidence the State has asked for in a timely manner? Will they have to drop that line of defense?