This post and those above are the results of my fast, but bad, typing and are in no way implied to be anywhere near 100 % correct, and is only snipplets of what the Prosector said in her closing - I did the best I could.
She, on the other hand, was excellent.
cont...
There was no other reason for these events to happen other than to expose their sexual orientation and sexual activities.
The defendant was not happy about that - you don’t need to hear words – “He did it because he did not like gays” Listen to the judge; he will explain what the State had to prove
What did his actions prove? The fact that he was targeting his roommate – because it was not what he wanted his college experience to be, he did not want a gay roommate, he was going to use it to his advantage and expose Tyler’s sexual orientation.
Read all of his text messages, and the words and thoughts they contain.
All of the text messages, 55 messages were deleted between he and Michelle Wong, 31 text messages between Molly Wei - when she was with the police. 86 messages were deleted by Ravi before he gave his cell phone to the police.
Look at the evidence, the tweets, the text messages, in the form of net flow data, the cell phone records
While the words are extremely important – the actions are even more important, those acts should speak loud and clear to you about the events when Tyler and MB had their privacy invaded by Ravi's actions - all set up by him, all with a motivation to expose Tyler and MB, and treat them differently. Purposely, knowingly targeting them for invasion of privacy due to their sexual orientations
There was not one thing that could clarify this as a petty misunderstanding. Look at all of the overlapping events – the cover-up – guilt for the actions he did, that he attempted - and I ask that you hold him accountable for his actions and his words.
The State rests
hoh:
