Hmmm..... as someone who used to work in journalism, I think there are a few unsubstantiated “facts” in this so-called news article.
For example, the author has written “[WM] , a man friends say had no depressive tendencies . . . “
The author spoke with “friends” of WM? Really? Which friends? How well did these “friends” know WM? What other information did these “friends” offer?
Are readers to believe that a reporter from a small, rather minor paper spoke to WM’s “friends” when no other main-stream media appears to have had access to them? In the meantime, another reporter (Ann Brocklehurst), one with some strong media credentials, mentioned that her sources suggested WM might have had
an alcohol problem. Alcohol is a depressant and “depressive tendencies” are
commonly associated with alcohol addiction.
Then the author wrote, “]DM] also rewarded friends with expensive trips, including his racing partner [AM], who rode with him in Mexico's famous Baja 500 off-road desert race in 2011.”
Did the author verify that DM paid for AM’s trip to Baja? How? Did AM tell him so? Photos indicate that the two were at the Baja event together, but I doubt the writer has evidence that DM “rewarded” AM with that trip.
The author wrote: “[DM], who inherited his father's wealth after his death”. Again, I doubt that the writer has seen the probate documents or spoken to the family’s estate lawyer. I mean, who knows? Maybe MB inherited everything and passed along much of it to DM. Maybe DM embezzled all the funds from a family charity. Maybe WM left his wealth to the family dog and DM has been dipping into the dog's trust fund. One should not assume, particularly reporters.
I note that the writer has used some adjectives that belie any objectivity. “Expensive trips”, “expensive properties”, “beautiful fiancée”. I mean, who has determined whether or not the trips were expensive? How is “expensive” defined? Many middle-class people vacation in Mexico because it’s affordable. Many working-class people purchase condos or farms in the Greater Toronto Area. And some people actually become engaged to plain-faced women who have qualities beyond their facial beauty!
I suspect this is the work of an inexperienced reporter who was attempting to write a “larger” piece then he had the background or skills to complete. It looks like he has spoken to a couple of locals (most of whom who did not even know those involved) and then has taken some liberties with Internet rumours and bits gleaned from other news articles.