Key, and I do mean key, details, hidden from the public that would have immediately put all attention on the new POI were:
1. tire tracks and shoe prints matching his
2. both the act and particular manner in which AL was assaulted during the abduction
What I'd like to know is, if this guy was "overlooked" by mistake, why were these details withheld for 26 years? If no third party information was coming in after, say, 10 years, I cannot see why this information being kept confidential was of any value any more. On the contrary, public knowledge of this would have immediately put the focus right back on the POI if he had been missed by mistake.
1. tire tracks and shoe prints matching his
2. both the act and particular manner in which AL was assaulted during the abduction
What I'd like to know is, if this guy was "overlooked" by mistake, why were these details withheld for 26 years? If no third party information was coming in after, say, 10 years, I cannot see why this information being kept confidential was of any value any more. On the contrary, public knowledge of this would have immediately put the focus right back on the POI if he had been missed by mistake.