This revelation about a leak makes me wonder. The sexual assault of AL made it clear that:
1. LE must know that the cluster of attacks prior to 22 October were perpetrated by the same person
2. If LE suspected someone in particular (like, say, this new POI) why would they not want *this* POI to know ... that they know?
3. If the POI finds out that surely LE knows the same person committed the clusters and the JEW abduction, why would LE *need* to arrest him right away?
The POI has to imagine that AL did report it, but given the nature of the act, perhaps it would leave him unsure if it was reported at all?
Of course, it could just be that they were hoping for tips on someone implicated in both sets of crimes as a way of knowing if it is a legit tip. But that seems thin to withhold something like this for 26 years.
1. LE must know that the cluster of attacks prior to 22 October were perpetrated by the same person
2. If LE suspected someone in particular (like, say, this new POI) why would they not want *this* POI to know ... that they know?
3. If the POI finds out that surely LE knows the same person committed the clusters and the JEW abduction, why would LE *need* to arrest him right away?
The POI has to imagine that AL did report it, but given the nature of the act, perhaps it would leave him unsure if it was reported at all?
Of course, it could just be that they were hoping for tips on someone implicated in both sets of crimes as a way of knowing if it is a legit tip. But that seems thin to withhold something like this for 26 years.