Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Lawyer she lives with is paying the bill but I bet the amount of legal fees is figured into the suit also.
As a resident of New Jersey, I can attest to the enormously high property taxes, that her parents already pay toward a public education.
My own child went to private school for years and years and it's like paying twice!
She should appreciate the education they were WILLING to give her for the small price of common courtesy and respect.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Could happen, but the child could certainly attend her local public school for free, which is funded by the community. I don't know a thing about her school specifically, but I believe NJ is known for its fantastic public schools, isn't it?
Reading about the dad a bit, turns out he actually graduated from the same public high school the daughter would have attended.
If anything, the parents were the ones to enroll her in private school, and thus should be obligated to finish paying out the year. The other requests are a bit more problematic, but I really believe there's more to this story we're not hearing. I can't believe a lawyer would waste $12k on a frivolous suit for someone else's child - or that most family law attorneys would even touch this case, without some significant information we're missing here.
It sounds like entitlement, but I wonder if there's more to this story. Even if a family was kind enough to take a child in during conflict with her parents, to suggest and facilitate a lawsuit, it sounds like there's more going on.
If anything, the parents were the ones to enroll her in private school, and thus should be obligated to finish paying out the year. The other requests are a bit more problematic, but I really believe there's more to this story we're not hearing. I can't believe a lawyer would waste $12k on a frivolous suit for someone else's child - or that most family law attorneys would even touch this case, without some significant information we're missing here.
Waiting to see how this all plays out. Even if someone wants attention, they're not ponying up twelve grand for a random kid to gain it.
A partial ruling today that her parents do not have to pay her high school tuition. As to the remainder of the complaint (pertaining to college tuition) has been delayed until April 22.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/rachel-canning-sues-parents-make-cover-school-expenses/story?id=22768908
Filed court documents
http://cbsnewyork.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/rachel-canning.pdf
It sounds like entitlement, but I wonder if there's more to this story. Even if a family was kind enough to take a child in during conflict with her parents, to suggest and facilitate a lawsuit, it sounds like there's more going on.
If anything, the parents were the ones to enroll her in private school, and thus should be obligated to finish paying out the year. The other requests are a bit more problematic, but I really believe there's more to this story we're not hearing. I can't believe a lawyer would waste $12k on a frivolous suit for someone else's child - or that most family law attorneys would even touch this case, without some significant information we're missing here.
Waiting to see how this all plays out. Even if someone wants attention, they're not ponying up twelve grand for a random kid to gain it.
This would set a horrible precedent if spoiled kids could move out and demand living expenses from their parents.
I saw the lawyer/helper parents picture on the news and got a funny feeling...enough to come here and see if this had been noticed by anyone else :moo:
I just remembered.... didn't Sandusky's lawyer have a similar issue in his past? He helped an underage intern in his office emancipate herself from her parents? Did he marry her? I can't remember....
A New Jersey family court judge ruled today that Rachel Canning’s parents do not have to pay her high school tuition after she sued them to cover her schooling and living costs.
The judge delayed a ruling on whether the parents must pay the 18-year-old student’s college tuition while asking lawyers to consider whether it’s wise to “establish precedent where parents live in fear of establishing rules of the house?"
The judge also denied her request for attorney fees, although ruling that the parents should continue with weekly allowance and "child support" payments to their daughter.
Judge Peter Bogaard noted that Rachel Canning’s behavior over the past year has been in question — one or two school suspensions, drinking, losing her captaincy on the cheerleading squad and being kicked out of the campus ministry.
I would have thought that the parents would have been liable for the high school tuition, but that the daughter would not have the standing to sue on that, only the school would. However, the court found differently. As predicted, the court said the parents are not responsible for her attorney fees, which frankly seemed very high at this point. It doesnt take $12,000 to draft and file a complaint. At that rate, by the time they get to the next hearing, daughter will probably owe $20,000 in fees. I doubt very much that she will win anything other than MAYBE some living expenses but that will end quickly as well. Her attorney stated that the home was "abusive" but she will have to set out exactly what that alleged abuse consists of. A ridiculous case.