I am just catching up on this thread and I am stunned at the stuff I am reading about Rolling Stone doing a feature on biggest news story of the year thus far
ugh aweful 7-Eleven and CVS refused to sell Boston bomber issue......CVS, Walgreens, Kmart and Rite Aid
the article's author....."It's kind of astonishing. No one has even read it yet!"
The same image has also appeared in the New York Times and other media over the past few months. (me: no uproar there)
According to Ad Age, the boycott may not put much of a dent in the magazine's bottom line.
the RS ban is not that rare in the magazine world. "It doesn't happen a lot but it's not unusual for mainstream magazines to be banned,
"Newsstand sales are such a small part of Rolling Stone's total circulation that losing sales at a handful of retailers won't have much effect. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if newsstand sales are higher than usual, given the amount of attention the cover has received. Overall, I don't think this will have any effect on Rolling Stone except to remind readers and advertisers how much they care about the magazine."
One person said that they had just signed up for a subscription to the magazine, writing, "I appreciate honest journalism. I also believe in freedom of the press," while others said the photo didn't glamorize Tsarnaev, but just showed how "unnerving [it is] to see how normal and similar he is."
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1710814/rolling-stone-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-cover.jhtml
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1710814/rolling-stone-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-cover.jhtml
Slate, New Yorker and USA Today Writers Defend Mag's Controversial Cover Choice
"Rolling Stone" was a Top 10 trending topic on Twitter for most of yesterday,
Rolling Stone has a long history of featuring serious news coverage as well as rock 'n' roll..
In a Slate post .... "Rolling Stone's Boston Bomber Cover Is Brilliant," We may want the media to reconfirm for us that psychopaths are crazed, nutty, creepy recluses whom we can easily identify and thus avoid. ....As Tsarnaev's many friends could attest, we aren't as good as we'd like to believe at spotting the evil beneath the surface.
New Yorker's ......straight at the camera all make him look like just another Rolling Stone cover boy...................these elements are not engineered.
the media certainly didn't shy away from publishing Osama bin Laden's face pretty much everywhere. I don't recall widespread objection to the media showing us, again and again, the face of the 9/11 mastermind.
The difference, of course, is that bin Laden was creepy/menacing-looking, whereas Tsarnaev... is not.....................
http://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/defense-rolling-stone-boston-bomber-cover/243172/
ME :
............any type of attention to this kid, we are doing that here !!!!!!!!