The Case of JonBenet Ramsey-CBS Sept. 18

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
This comports best with how I see the case too but the one thing I keep bumping up against is BR's age at the time. That children can engage in psychopathic violence is well documented but sexual sadism in someone who hasn't yet gone through puberty is hard to wrap my head around.

I didn't watch the show but I did read they tested whether a child could crack a skull. Was it just a skull and if so, how old was the skull they used as skulls become dried out and brittle as they age? Did they put the weight of the brain and other matters inside of the skull along with the thickness of her hair when they did it? Of course wouldn't this child know the goal was to crack the skull. Did it parallel exactly with the skull fracture JB had?
 
Oh I thought all the hype about this documentary was when they were questioned as to whether they would be naming someone specifically by name and their answer was 'yes.' Sounds pretty specific to me.

This was an article I read that had the transcripts of the interview done by those making this ABC documentary.

As surprising as that is, they did say they were going to name someone.
 
We will have to agree to disagree :)


I think the family are vile and have done everything within there power to stop the truth coming out. If Burke is guilty (I believe he is) then I don't even blame him. He grew up in a toxic environment where his sister was clearly loved and adored and he was angry and prone to lashing out which was probably a cry for attention. And that night he lashed out again at his sister with tragic consequences and the parents covered it up.

No problem.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything anyway. Just stating my own opinion, and yes, I am aware I am in the minority here.:)
 
Qmfr:



(I'm over here now, walked outside to "check the mail" lol, hoping I'd see him so I could tell him (er, what woould I tell him? :waitasec: Just hey I saw you on tv last night, I didn't know you worked the Ramsey case, how interesting, your book and work is well respected, will you please sign my book (on order)... :smile: )...I don't want to bug the guy and seem all crazy, ykwim....but boy would I sure like to pick his brain off the record! He seems to be a private person though so I don't think that will happen. :()

:websleuther:

Eta: Should I knock and ask to borrow some sugar? JUST KIDDING!!

Knock and see if you can borrow a 'flashlight' and then wink.......... great conversation starter.
 
As surprising as that is, they did say they were going to name someone.

Thank you. I was sure they absolutely said they were going to name someone by name so thanks for confirming what I was sure I had read.:) At least I know I read it right. lol
 
I didn't watch the show but I did read they tested whether a child could crack a skull. Was it just a skull and if so, how old was the skull they used as skulls become dried out and brittle as they age? Did they put the weight of the brain and other matters inside of the brain along with the thickness of her hair when they did it? Of course wouldn't this child know the goal was to crack the skull. Did it parallel exactly with the skull fracture JB had?

The skull demonstration was a complete joke. They referred to these things as "skulls" but they clearly were not made of bone, maybe plaster, and not even good looking for a fake either. Letting that aside, they were clearly modeled on an adult size skull so what they have to tell us about a fracture in a 6 year old's I've no idea. I couldn't tell you how exactly the two fractures paralleled because they never did an actual overlay comparison, just kind of eyeballed a similar size and shape.

None of this means it wasn't the weapon, just that it makes no compelling case that it was.
 
We will have to agree to disagree :)


I think the family are vile and have done everything within there power to stop the truth coming out. If Burke is guilty (I believe he is) then I don't even blame him. He grew up in a toxic environment where his sister was clearly loved and adored and was the favourite with Patsy and he was angry and prone to lashing out which was probably a cry for attention. And that night he lashed out again at his sister with tragic consequences and the parents covered it up.

Hi Asyousay, I agree that this family was toxic; however, I cannot give him a pass and say I don't blame him, because I do. This wasn't just a quick accident. This was, in my opinion, a long drawn out event -- perhaps even pre-planned. No way anyone in this family gets a pass in my book. Absolutely disgusting.
 
No problem.

I am not trying to convince anyone of anything anyway. Just stating my own opinion, and yes, I am aware I am in the minority here.:)

What's great about this place is our opportunity to discuss different thoughts and opinions. I've always respected your posts in other threads (Diana Alvares, etc), so glad to see you here oceanblueeyes. :wave:
 
I never saw them stonewall the police. I did see a family who knew they had a constitutional right to standup for themselves even to the police who had already honed in on them.

Unfortunately, there are too many examples of this to mention in one post. For starters, they obtained lawyers within hours (and possibly before) JBR's body was found. They did not speak with police without BPD going through their lawyers first and advised (threatened?) all their friends, family, etc. to act accordingly. They did a televised interview at the behest of their legal team before sitting down with police. They didn't interview with police until April 1997 after months of negotiations with their legal team that included stipulations such as reviewing all of the evidence and questions prior to the interview. These are but a few examples.

Constitutional rights are one thing, and yes, you can say that it was the Ramsey lawyers who did the stonewalling and not the Ramseys themselves. But money is another thing, and hiding behind a wall lawyers is not only suspicious, but it interfered with the BPD's ability to conduct their investigation as any other case would be have been investigated.
 
Oceanblueeyes,

I am curious to see whether the D.A.'s office will follow up on anything these documentaries (especially CBS tonight) presents.

Reading the articles about Stanley Garnett demonstrate to me that he has looked at this case since he became D.A

I agree with you that the D.A. has evidence that others' have not seen. I believe that, especially with Stanley Garnett, if anyone was to be charged now
or if any statement is forthcoming from the D.A.'s office, that it would be genuine. JMO
 
What's great about this place is our opportunity to discuss different thoughts and opinions. I've always respected your posts in other threads (Diana Alvares, etc), so glad to see you here oceanblueeyes. :wave:

I agree wholeheartedly!
 
1:05pm- JR finds JBR's body
Jim and Laura walk into the warehouse where they have built an exact replica of the Ramsey home for the crime scene reconstruction. (Impressive!)
Key rooms focused on in the reconstruction are, JBR room, spiral staircase, kitchen and basement including wine cellar.
Letter found on third step of spiral staircase.
Ron Walker- makes the observation that a stranger would place a similar note on a desk, table, kitchen counter.
Ron Walker shows Jim and Laura how he went through the basement.
Sgt Mason walked ahead of Ron Walker downstairs. around 1:20pm
Walker was trying to orient himself because he hadn't seen basement before.
He first noticed the three sets of windows and one was broken.
And the suitcase. His first thought was if the killers first thought was to put the body in the suitcase and remove the body from the crime scene.
and then in fact things moved too quickly and the perp was overtaken by events.
the two are looking around and Mason points to the wine cellar and says that's where JonBenet's body was found.
They both walk back to room.
Jim "feels like a tomb" describing the wine cellar reconstruction.
He stated the lights were on when he walked into the room primarily because JR had turned them on when he discovered JBR's body.
They discuss what JR does as he finds the body. Taking off duct tape and white blanket and leaving them in the wine cellar.
Ron "We didn't step into the room very far"
They didn't want to walk to far into the crime scene.
Jim recalls statements that JR stated "She was here before he even turned the lights on"
Ron states that looking at the reconstructed room he can SEE objects but can't recognize what they are. Describing the blanket he said it just looks like a jumble of cloth to him.
Jim states "how would you know that was actually your daughter wrapped up in there?"
Ron "As I recall, he's NEVER BEEN ASKED THOSE QUESTIONS." :notgood:
Laura, "Whu was that?"
Ron, "My belief was that the philosophy that was laid out for the police department that day was we have to treat them with Kid gloves. Treat them with deference, treat them as victims and not as suspects."
Laura: "Was there a reason given?"
Ron: "They were influential, they were wealthy"
Laura: "From what I can see, the influence here really have a significant impact as to why people were allowed to come and go from the house."
Ron "Going through the list of things that initially puzzled me, but then I started thinking when you add them all together, I started thinking well there's something really bizarre and odd about all of this. Right around the time I was there, there was another detective there that I think had overheard John making a call for his airplane (1:40pm) this is after the body has been discovered. Why does John Ramsey want to leave so quickly when he has to understand that there's going to be a police investigation and his daughter's just been killed?
Laura: "You know for me, this isn't just a red flag it's an absolute anomaly."
Ron "the first thing you do if you have witnesses is you separate them, you take them some place and you get a statement and you ask to get the Ramsey's interviewed by the police. In that first 24 to 36 hours."
Jim: "The only problem is they didn't get interviewed by the police."
Ron: "Oh they didn't? Right."
Laura:"That's why we really need to speak with Fleet because I want to know what was going on in that house. Fleet and Priscilla White are what we would call significant witnesses, they were best friends to the Ramsey's at the time and they were at that home during those hours that it all unfolded."
Jim and Laura discussing why the Ramsey's had people over the house that morning as they drive to Fleet's.
Fleet had concerns about talking openly about this case because they had a bad experience.
Fleet was one of the first people to question John. Fleet told John to stop hiding behind his lawyer and to cooperate with the police.
Fleet wrote a 14 page open letter to the DA and the Ramsey's and criticized them. He said the investigation has failed because the Ramsey's have refused to fully cooperate with investigators.
Jim and Laura are going to meet Fleet but he said no cameras so they have to stop filming until they are done.
Jim "It's more important that we it than we have it documented."
90 minutes later Jim and Laura pull back up to the waiting camera crew.
Laura: "Well it was fascinating. They have so much knowledge but there's a lot of pain there."
Snippet of Boulder City Counsel Meeting March 18, 2014 of Fleet White and his wife speaking in regards to how their family was labeled and perceived as murders, toturers of young children, pedophiles, and perjurers.
Laura: They are afraid and they don't want to see this ever happen again.
Eddie Schmidt executive producer "Do you think they understood how committed you really are?"
Jim: "Yeah they are willing to talk to us but they just don't want to do it on camera. And when we were leaving, Fleet took me aside and said 'Jim I really think we have some really important information that will help you' and I said 'of course you do that's why we're here and we'll keep coming back here as much as
we have to, to convince you that this is the right thing to do cause we really feel that it is."
Laura calls and drives to local homes to try and gather community intelligence. But everyone refuses to talk or get involved. Even the church won't comment.
Everyone seems fearful to talk.
She's becoming frustrated.
interview with Brian Scott- gardner (1994) He said Patsy wanted "Pristine Gardens" Patsy hired him. He didn't see John very much, once a season maybe. Didn't see Burke so much but JonBenet he saw often. She would always play near him.
He recalls when he would have all the leaves in a pile, she wanted to jump in them. He remembers it reminded her of the time she spent with her dad. She didn't mind getting dirty and she seemed like a normal kid that likes to play and misses her father. He said he doesn't know much about pageantry but he figured it demanded a lot of discipline. He remembers seeing her practicing the violin. Patsy reminded her to keep practicing and not put it down. What he remembers about Burke is he stuck to himself. Seemed a little more introverted. She was more engaging and outgoing than him.
Patsy was pleasant and nice. one of his memories was when they announced the O.J. verdict he was at their house and spoke with Patsy about it. Patsy told him that OJ was declared innocent. She thought OJ got away with murder. She didn't like that one bit. she did say 'you can get away with murder in this country'.

Laura and Jim interview Patsy's friend and photographer Judith Phllips.
first met in Atlanta. more social friends back then. In Boulder they became closer because they were on a softball team together called Mom's Gone Bad. :silenced:
Spoke kindly of the Ramsey's and said they had a lot of friends and were good hosts. "Patsy was fun to be around. She was a showgirl. So her clothing, her home, she was a girl that never compromised." Judith's daughter was Burkes age but played with JonBenet.
One time her daughter said she and JB were in JB's room and she asked about all the awards that were on display and JB said she was in the pageant system but she didn't make a big deal out of it but she said they really belong more to my mom. They're more my mom's trophies than they are mine.
Judith recalls once seeing JonBenet in a beautiful dress and bleach blonde hair and asked Patsy if she was dying her hair and Patsy said Oh no that's from the summer sun in Michigan.:waiting:
Judith knew immediately she was lying to her. It bothered her that she was lying to her and wondered why she wouldn't just tell the truth.
Jim asked Judith to describe Patsy after seeing her after JonBenet's death.
Stated she looked exhausted and kept repeating who could've killed my baby. That was the last time she saw her. She was cut off. "We were told in our circle of friends in Boulder, do not talk to reporters and do not talk to the police."
Jan 1997- "Out of respect for the family, much of Boulder has closed ranks since the murder." Newsweek.
Judith was shocked at the response. She said if she knew anything that might help the investigation, she wasn't going to be silent. "I felt a duty to the memory of JonBenet. I loved her very much. " She starts crying at this point. (Bless her heart! At least some care!)
She opened her doors to reporters and spoke with the police twice. They just cut her off as a friend. They thought she had betrayed them. "You know at the time I didn't understand but in hindsight, it's because I told the.. I..I.. didn't obey what all the other friends did. "
Jim- "How did you feel when you saw them actually doing the opposite? They went on CNN."
Judith- "I felt they were hypocrites. and when Patsy said hold your babies close to you, there's a murderer in town, it frightened my daughter so much that she couldn't sleep in her own bedroom for several months."
Jim: "what did you think about that?"
Judith- "I thought it was bogus.
Jim: "Really?"
Judith: "yeah, in fact Patsy asked a favor of me, to go to the mayor, I knew the mayor because I had photographed her, Patsy said please ask for protection for my family. So I went to the mayor's office and I said Patsy wants protection and she said there's no murderer out there."
Laura:" How does it make you feel when you know 20 years have passed?"
Judith: "I feel angry. I feel angry that that little girl, still, after all these years, has not gotten justice. And I don't believe she ever will." Wiping tears away.

(Sorry it's taking so long! I'm sick today.) Continued in a bit.
 
Oh I thought all the hype about this documentary was when they were questioned as to whether they would be naming someone specifically by name and their answer was 'yes.' Sounds pretty specific to me.

This was an article I read that had the transcripts of the interview done by those making this ABC documentary.
Your question is why didn't or why don't the police just name BR as the one who did it and say they had/have irrefutable evidence... and my answer is because the Boulder PD can't say it's "irrefutable." It would be the DA that would decide that and the DA is not going forward with charging any of them. Besides, "irrefutable" would mean there's not just the possibility or probability of it being BR, but that everyone else can absolutely be excluded. The evidence isn't *that* definitive.
 
Can anyone please give their thoughts on where JR was when he went missing for about an hour after the body was discovered? I think I have missed this information before. Thanks.
My own personal opinion is this is the time during when he found her body and probably had a major meltdown. He was said to be acting much different when he returned. Whether or not he was in the basement with her I don't know. I've even wondered if maybe he was the one who wrapped her in the blanket and made her look more presentable. MOO
 
Sorry if mentioned, did you guys see the CBS preview clip yesterday for today of Burke's interview, where he comments on secrets, something like if he remembered any, he wouldn't tell you anyway?
 
Because they don't have "irrefutable" evidence, there is evidence that shows BR cannot be excluded from the list of suspects. In addition PR is still on the list, as is JR. There are 3 possible suspects--which one actually swung the maglite onto JBR's head?

Exactly. You only have theories. Some are quite good, but you cannot close a murder case on a theory. The Nicole Simpson/Ron Goldman murder case remains open, but I am quite sure LE isn't spending much time on it since everyone knows who did it.

The only way they could close this is if Burke or John Confesses. That, IMO, is about as likely as Patsy confessing.
 
Flight time from CO - GA is over 3 hours on a commercial flight.

JR was making arrangements with his pilot to fly his private plane to Atlanta. His phone call with the pilot was interrupted by a BPD detective stating that he couldn't go anywhere (obviously!). JR told the detective he had urgent matters to attend to in Atlanta. Originally the family was to be flying to their vacation home in Charlevoix 12/26/96, so JR was speaking with his pilot to change the flight to Atlanta instead. The trips to Charlevoix and the Disney cruise were cancelled.

We know that Lin Wood is in Atlanta and JR retained lawyers very quickly. BDA prevented BPD from obtaining phone records, so we can only make assumptions. Mine is that JR was arranging to meet his attorneys in person asap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
191
Guests online
316
Total visitors
507

Forum statistics

Threads
609,727
Messages
18,257,370
Members
234,739
Latest member
Shymars1900
Back
Top