fedfan4life
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2011
- Messages
- 399
- Reaction score
- 11
Just because it's difficult to imagine doesn't mean it can't happen.
Right. I can't really imagine an atom either (as an example), but alas...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because it's difficult to imagine doesn't mean it can't happen.
Possible. But very, very tenuous.
Now that it has finished airing, has anyone found any holes in the theories stated on the show?
- 'Foreign Faction - Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet?', J Kolar (not sure what page because I only own the e-book edition, sorry!)"I had also found it interesting that the Paughs had reportedly purchased several books on childhood behavior for the Ramsey family. The titles of the books were intriguing:
- The Hurried Child - Growing Up Too Fast, by David Elkind;
- Children at Risk, Dobson/Bruer;
- Why Johnny Can't Tell Right From Wrong, Kilpatrick
3) Did anyone else feel like they kind of brushed over the fecal matter on the chocolates, which Burke had smeared on the walls, and in JonBenet's bed? That's another thing that struck me as something which was probably left out of the full cut. It was like they said it, and then 'Okay, time to move on'. Or maybe I'm just crazy.
Yes!! It is such a strange thing that's always given such little attention, almost to the point of 'hahaa, kids amirite?' sometimes. Drives me insane!I ALWAYS feel like that is brushed over and just accepted as a fact of the case and to me it is SO bizarre.
Not any holes, but I do wonder why they sent BR over to FW's house ? If he killed JBR, weren't his parents afraid he might tell all ? I do find it somewhat disturbing that BR is now saying that he got up that night. I get the vibe that he's playing us...deep down I get the sense that he's really enjoying playing us...jmo
I think J.R. was directing the cover up. The letter conceived by both and helped in the verbiage with both. They had only 1 child left, and they'd sacrifice anyone (even god himself) to save that one's future, imo. Sadly, the opposite now may be true.
The 911 call heard what the operator said was Patsy saying what sounded like, "Now what" or "what's next".
Can't recall all the details of the show now but I got the impression it was he who was the main director, more calm, more cool then she was.
I also recall sitting in their L.R., the detectives said, they didn't touch each other which is strange in itself, not to console your spouse after just losing a child.
Yes!! It is such a strange thing that's always given such little attention, almost to the point of 'hahaa, kids amirite?' sometimes. Drives me insane!
I'm going through the thread now on last night's show (great posts, everyone!). I haven't gotten through all posts yet, so please excuse this if someone has already addressed this. My questions are about the whole sexual abuse thing that was covered last night, so I need some help from one of the Websleuth experts to help me understand this.
When I watched the show last night I was also in the chat room at the same time, and I think I initially misinterpreted what Spitz and Lee were saying. I'd *originally* thought they were say that after Spitz examined the microscope slide, he concluded that there was no evidence of *prior* sexual abuse before JonBenet's death. But when I went back later and rewatched this segment, I think I got that wrong and what Spitz and Lee were actually saying was that there was no evidence of sexual abuse/sexual trauma/sexual intrusion (whatever words you want to use) ON THE NIGHT she was killed. Do I have that right? (If so, my apologies to bubbiegirl because in the chat room I told her the opposite!)
So if I have that right, can fellow WS members help me with the following questions:
1. Am I correct that the experts *never* addressed on the show last night whether or not there was evidence of ongoing, recurring sexual abuse happening prior to the night JonBenet was killed?
2. If they are saying there was no sexual intrusion the night she was killed, where did the blood in JBR's underwear come from? (Kolar asks this as well on the show and I felt he wasn't given a very convincing answer). And as other posters have already stated, this was a fresh pair of underwear she was put in, so a prior pair of undies might have had even more blood on it. Plus, am I remembering correctly that the smear on JBR's thigh (which was found during the autopsy) was actually determined to be JBR's own blood that had been wiped away by something (a cloth or whatever)? So if no sexual intrusion that night (made by a paint brush or some other object), where did this blood come from?
3. If the experts last night are saying no sexual abuse the night she was killed, then how do they explain the inflamation and blood in the vaginal vault that was found and documented in the autopsy?
Thanks in advance for anyone's help in making sense of this for me!
Maybe. Along those same lines, maybe it was as you say: he didn't respect her, but viewed her as "his." And no one was going to take what was "his." That's one other idea I've got.
What they said was no sexual assault the night she died.
Another corroborating evidence for the CBS is that no credible evidence of the intruder was found. No crushed leaves, strange cars, bits of clothings on the fence or elsewhere.
Also, a "small faction" would have went in with several people and armed AND kidnapped BOTH kids almost certainly while gagging and tying up the parents.
Also, an older boy would be more valuable than a younger girl methinks.
I had an epiphany moment watching the CBS special last night. I previously thought Patsy did it, but seeing the video of Burke refusing to say what was in the bowl (the pineapple) completely blew me away. He was so sheepish, absolute "deer in the headlights" when asked about it. He visibly reacted in an unequivocally guilty manner and his feet started bouncing almost off of the chair. That's the only time he exhibited those behaviors. He seemed sheepish, embarrassed, and caught.