CajunStrong
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2012
- Messages
- 406
- Reaction score
- 0
Trying to prove that they are seeing something in the photos, regardless of physics, camera refraction/pixels, LE evidence released, etc. I'm pretty sure after trial, if it is in fact found that nothing is actually in the picture other than BSL's truck, there will still be a DWT thread and still be claims.
Sorry JMO.
I have not seen anyone disprove what we see and what some of us have heard. For every argument against it, I have seen another that supports it, not one side any more influential than the other.
Not one thing you have mentioned above has disproved anything at all to me. I don't know of any police evidence that disproves it. Physics has been explained on both sides and none of us are experts and able to give a true expert opinion. Same with camera refraction, etc., I have heard people claim to be well versed in this subject on both sides with differing opinions.
I have a feeling there will be a lot of "I told you so's' in the end. Not sure from which side.
If this goes to trial and/or is otherwise explained by police once everything is final and done, then I will believe what they have said. Once a sentence has been handed down there is no reason to not disclose all evidence. But don't be so sure that it will not be the other way around.