Thank you.
I am a firm believer in the death penalty where it is warranted. If DR is guilty she certainly warrants for it to be applied.
But, imoo there have been too many unanswered questions which can only be answered by the highly trained experts at TIP who are first, and foremost at uncovering the true answers we should all want.
We are aware that others have been put to death only to be found totally innocent after it's way too late to undo the grave harm done to them.
However I believe in justice, and fairness for the entire process. If there are further testing available... not usually done in trials or in appeals, Those with higher knowledge testing techniques must be allowed to test them. This is some of the reasons how new testing is found, and becomes highly valuable to our forensic communities throughout our justice system.
Imo, from following many TIP cases for many years now they thought it very worthy of taking each one, and it turned out TIP was right for taking those cases they painstakely select.
Imo, it shows TIP highly trained experts see major flaws in the evidence entered in Darlie's trial, and they feel they may find evidence of their own that merits taking her case that can greatly contradict them.
If not, they would have selected from the thousands of others cases they are begging to take they feel has more merit. They selected hers for valid reasons they see in it.
They are an amazing group of people. They don't fall for every guilty murder defendant who tells them they are innocent. They only select cases they feel once all of their evidence is tested by some of the best experts in the world can the real truth be known.
If it reaffirms guilt, then so be it, but if not then we as a nation should all be thankful for the many heroes at TIP. This is not their first rodeo by any means. I trust them explicitly to find out all the answers.
Jmho