I really don't get how anyone could come to the conclusion she's not a danger to society. She even testified that she got a gun for that camping trip, just in case someone would make a move on her, and as a battered woman she can't just say no, she has to obey, even when feeling uncomfortable, and then she starts shaking, and then someone might say something mean to her, and - woosh! - she's in THE FOG and only regains consciousness several hundred miles away with blood on her hands and the vague idea that something bad had happened.
And that's only taking her own testimony and interview, and not considering the possibility she killed out of jealousy or even simply monetary gains.
She showed a massive amount of criminal energy, not only in planning the crime, but also in her attempts to cover it up and further her new claims of self defense (see the magazine messages). There's no remorse, no insight, no barrier to mess with justice.
On a lighter note, maybe the foreman's rather delusional statements can serve as a future example that a new jury wasn't tainted to JA's disadvantage. Everyone likes to cite HLN, but with all those interviews of JA and now the foreman, there's plenty of support for her point of view spread through the media. So it gets harder to argue it's one-sided.
Just like she did poor Travis 
