BigCityAccountant
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 3,436
- Reaction score
- 250
.This just makes me ill.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
I'm with you Kellyd and :welcome4:
.This just makes me ill.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
I am going to purchase the book. Often times in books like this new things will become known because all witnesses on the witness list are never called to tesify but what they stated is known by the prosecution.
He's a straight up liar, IMO.BCA ~ just from the bit I read ... the "little" and "creepy, thought Teresa" were just a few of many embellishments!
Like I said in my first post, it's ironic that the premise of the book is to set the record straight and clear up what MaM got wrong, and in doing that, IMO he is changing the facts, or embellishing, or whatever word you want to use LOL
I bet you could too😉if you scroll all the way to the bottom it says "pages 41-172 are not shown in this preview" .... if you have more pages than me.... I'm calling conspiracy hahaha
I do think there is more pages though, because the "forward" I don't think is included as page numbers? the hard copy of the book on amazon said it was 192 pages, did NG take up 20 maybe?
JMO but 192 pages seems pretty short, I feel like I could type that up in no time! And I bet I could source my facts.. just sayin'
My thoughts exactly!You couldn't pay me to read the book.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
I am going to purchase the book. Often times in books like this new things will become known because all witnesses on the witness list are never called to tesify but what they stated is known by the prosecution.
I put a review out there. It disgusts me that he is trying to profit from this.I was actually considering it.... But now that I have read the preview and seeing that he got some pretty basic facts wrong, or not stating whole truths, there is no way that I would be able to believe anything that he said, so I don't see the point in reading it now.
I put a review out there. It disgusts me that he is trying to profit from this.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Beginning six years after the trial, in January 2013, Steven Avery and I exchanged a series of letters. He knew that I was no longer a DA and no longer represented the state and he invited...
That is where that page (page 164) ends and 165 is not viewable in my preview. Page 166 is the only letter I can find, the one where Steven suggests Kratz be his attorney.
He's grossSpeaking of Kratz. I am sure many of you have seen this "interview" with Jena Friedman.
https://youtu.be/H-jF2Q3wjFE
I find it quite interesting how he answers her when asked if he killed TH. That sly little laugh!
He also remembers that he has an alibi. I wonder if he talks about his alibi in his book. He is a strange strange man.
Great questions!Speaking of KK, in the DO NOT thread, they are talking about SB calling SA on November 3rd. Does anyone know where this is documented other than in the upstanding model citizen of Calumet County's book. (sarcasm included)
You know that guy that made this statement "She was creeped out [by him]. She [went to her employer and] said she would not go back because she was scared of him," Kratz said.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Netflix-s-hit-documentary.html#ixzz4YaxsFgdz
So scared, that she did go back without a complaint to her employer.
I find it very suspicious that the roommate who is known to have had an intimate relationship with TH, making an claim that he spoke with SA, when it cannot be verified that he spoke directly to SA. Like I said in another post, its like the pot calling the kettle black. Both should have been suspects to me and SB should not have gotten a free pass.
I'd also like to know how that works~~SB calls BD's phone on November 3rd and SA just happens to be over there and answers the phone? Where were the other 5 members of the house that SA had to answer their phone?
Any insight would be appreciated.
.Great questions!
Missy???
Oh Missy! Lol
I swear Missy has the memory of a dolphin❤
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Great questions!
Missy???
Oh Missy! Lol
I swear Missy has the memory of a dolphin❤
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
.
Like I said, I'd hate to be one of her children, that is assuming she has children.
Here you are, my friend😉 One of many links😊I was at work LOL sorry! haha Do dolphins have a good memory? do you have a link for that haha
I do... and they hate it so does my hubby! :tantrum:
Speaking of KK, in the DO NOT thread, they are talking about SB calling SA on November 3rd. Does anyone know where this is documented other than in the upstanding model citizen of Calumet County's book. (sarcasm included)
https://books.google.com/books?id=c... the numbers that she called that day&f=false
You know that guy that made this statement "She was creeped out [by him]. She [went to her employer and] said she would not go back because she was scared of him," Kratz said.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Netflix-s-hit-documentary.html#ixzz4YaxsFgdz
So scared, that she did go back without a complaint to her employer.
I find it very suspicious that the roommate who is known to have had an intimate relationship with TH, making an claim that he spoke with SA, when it cannot be verified that he spoke directly to SA. Like I said in another post, its like the pot calling the kettle black. Both should have been suspects to me and SB should not have gotten a free pass.
I'd also like to know how that works~~SB calls BJ's phone on November 3rd and SA just happens to be over there and answers the phone? Where were the other 5 members of the house that SA had to answer their phone?
Any insight would be appreciated.
I think we need to go back to the basics... go to page 2, when they first responded to the missing person report. The initial investigation from Calumet County didn't start until 5pm on the 3rd. Lemiuex speaks to TH's mom, then Scott B. by phone, then Angela at AT...
Cpl. Leslie Lemieux
DAWN states she, in fact, had talked with TERESA on Monday morning, 10/31/05. DAWN states they had received a phone call from somebody who identified himself as B.JANDA. DAWN states she knows the JANDAS are basically the AVERY brothers. She States they have done work for them before and she does not know why they give the name of B. JANDA
*snipped by me*
She did state when she had talked to TERESA, TERESA had told her she
was going to go out to the AVERY property to take the photo. DAWN states TERESA seemed
fine on the phone when she had spoken with her. DAWN states TERESA always seems to be a
pretty upbeat person when she speaks with her and does not know of any type of problems that
TERESA would have.
DAWN did tell me TERESA had confided in her about STEVEN AVERY on one prior
occasion. She states STEVEN had come out of the house wearing nothing but a towel one time
and TERESA was somewhat concerned by that.