faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
relevant statements of the Defendent...hmmm...relevant to what pray tell? This murder case or some OTHER case involved?
LE will view things as relevant that we will not nesecarily notice. The letters could be more pure unadulterated KC bullsh@t, in fact they probably are. But they are comitted to paper with a trail that puts them as coming from her. Even if they are just another stream of bs (nanny, stranger on the street, JG, whatever) chances are the story she tells vastly differs from what she told investigators at the begining.
To put this another way. Even if she chooses not to testify at trial, these letters will do it for her. There will be almost no way to exclude them. They are either a confession or they are another lie. If a lie it will be easy enough for LE to prove. And if they are more KC bullsh@t it is almost as damning as if they were a confession. Because they are her handwriting, her words directly, and I would bet the content of the letters does not match the one that LE recorded her telling back at universal. It quite possibly puts her lies in front of the jury by her own hand, not through someone elses testimony.
That could be damning.