Eileen730
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Messages
- 20,232
- Reaction score
- 255
I totally get where you are coming from Eileen.
I think the moment he used 'their' money to have her killed it kind of changed the normal feelings of 'ours' or 'theirs' in terms of the relationship and especially their finances.
I hope you can cut us some slack and have an understanding. I think the moment he used their money to finance her murder- all bets were off for many of us here.
He controlled the household finances and the finances of the practice- it is becoming clear that he maybe wasn't doing what he should have or keeping up his end of the marriage bargain.
We know from cases in the news and here on WS people do this kind of shady stuff to the other spouse all the time.
I think when you are lying, cheating (I don't mean affairs) and misrepresenting things it sort of changes the facts of whose money is whose by default.
I'm a stay at home mom. I don't lie to my husband about finances or misrepresent things, I don't cheat or steal finances and I have never used my husbands hard earned money to pay to have him murdered.
Please forgive our one sidedness in the matter of the Sievers money. I think it is well deserved.
I understand where u are coming from.
But who said he controlled the money or lied about finances?
I'm not trying to argue here just discuss because I don't really know where some of this info is coming from,