Think about it, WHY on god's earth would an intruder REDRESS the child? Give me a break, it makes no sense on its face. This intruder, breaks into the house, abuses the girl and then puts her clothes back on?? For what purpose?
I wonder if the family can sue?
Incomplete DNA is just fine for exoneration. If it doesn't match, no matter how incomplete the DNA, you cannot have been the person who provided that DNA. Incomplete just means that a lot of people match the DNA. But it's just fine for exoneration.Wrong! The DNA then just like now is INCOMPLETE (caps for emphasis, I'm not yelling at you). They didn't have enough markers to match it to anyone.
Oh and (I think someone else mentioned it too, but here it is again) why wasn't PATSY'S "touch DNA" found on the longjohns? It was PATSY who dressed her in the longjohns....oops!
Well how lucky for the mystery intruder that the Ramseys made it impossible for the police to investigate the crime properly.
Just think, IF the police had been able to EXCLUDE them quickly, they wouldn't have been forced to waste time while their daughter's killer walked free.
I agree Tex. The Ramseys have now officially joined other parents that were falsely accused in the disappearance of their child, such as the Van Dam's, the Aisenbergs, the Smarts, etc..
Now that the Ramsey's have been declared innocent, I assume this means they can no longer be bashed here anymore. Or is there a different site standard that permits victims (such as the parents) in Jon Benet's case to be bashed versus all other cases where victim bashing is not permitted?
Thanks for your note. (And you're lucky to live in Idaho; such a beautiful state.)
I think that many home invaders, rapists, and pedophiles actually crave dangerous situations; they don't want to get caught, but the excitement of the situation is part of the thrill. I think that the BTK killer and several others have described these weird and disgusting sensations.
Now that the Ramsey's have been declared innocent, I assume this means they can no longer be bashed here anymore. Or is there a different site standard that permits victims (such as the parents) in Jon Benet's case to be bashed versus all other cases where victim bashing is not permitted?
Incomplete DNA is just fine for exoneration. If it doesn't match, no matter how incomplete the DNA, you cannot have been the person who provided that DNA. Incomplete just means that a lot of people match the DNA. But it's just fine for exoneration.
I don't know if Patsy's DNA was or was not found. But it wasn't found in the panties. It's a match of unknown DNA that should have been nowhere near a little girl's panties for any innocent reason (unless it's manufacturer DNA) to the exact same DNA on her tights. DNA one place - could be chance, the person who packed them at the plant, etc. Two places on a dead girl's body - it's not chance. And since this is not her parents, not her brother, no one known to have access to her for innocent reasons, this is the killer.
Yes, remember all the new to this forum posters who were quick to jump on the John Mark Karr bandwagon despite the fact it didn't fit all the other evidence in the case???:bang:
Very true. BTK took one victim to his church and re dressed her in bondage clothing and took pics.
No way a Stage four cancer survivor kills her own child. Cances gives you instant clarity on what's important. Bed wetting and that nonsense....please.
Oh man if the BPD and DA's office could be sued......the very people who enabled the Ramseys from the get-go. Too many things are weird about this case to completely exonerate the parents/a parent. It's not a black & white case at all, especially if you know the background of how all this was botched up from the beginning.Sue who?! The BPD? LOL - I wish they would so that all of the info is out on the table, but I betcha that will not happen. How would the cronic erosion of JonBenet's hymen be pinned on a One Time Only Intruder?!
RiverRat and others - yes, they did check if this could have been an autopsy tech....Lacy's office had the Colorado Bureau of Investigation analyze other samples to make sure the DNA profile could not have been left during the autopsy, when JonBenét's clothes were removed.
That was not the case, the CBI reported on June 27.
Now that the Ramsey's have been declared innocent, I assume this means they can no longer be bashed here anymore. Or is there a different site standard that permits victims (such as the parents) in Jon Benet's case to be bashed versus all other cases where victim bashing is not permitted?
I don't think this is going to change anybody's mind.
THe people that have always thought the Ramsey's were not guilty are going to feel vindicated and claim now there is "proof" of innocence.
The people that have always believed one or both of the Ramsey's were guilty are not going to change their mind over one single 'new' piece of information, especially coming from a DA who has been touting the intruder idea all along.
Yeah right......we do not have an Intruder that makes a lower case "q" look like the number 8 - just like Patsy!!! See below.......
Lacy is leaving office soon, so this is her last attempt to help the Ramseys fool people that have not really followed every detail and it works on some unfortunately, but then they will feel as silly as they did for believing anything that comes out of her mouth - just like they did when John Mark Karr was exposed to be a nothing.
Think about it, WHY on god's earth would an intruder REDRESS the child? Give me a break, it makes no sense on its face. This intruder, breaks into the house, abuses the girl and then puts her clothes back on?? For what purpose?
And this is very sad.I don't think this is going to change anybody's mind.
THe people that have always thought the Ramsey's were not guilty are going to feel vindicated and claim now there is "proof" of innocence.
The people that have always believed one or both of the Ramsey's were guilty are not going to change their mind over one single 'new' piece of information, especially coming from a DA who has been touting the intruder idea all along.
haha you really haven't followed this case have you