angelwngs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2004
- Messages
- 5,038
- Reaction score
- 482
Make that two. :clap:
Thanks to You, # two, too! (lol)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Make that two. :clap:
Wouldn't anyone???Why would they search the house when they saw she was not in her room and had just read a ransom note stating she was kidnapped for ransom? When did Patsy call 911?
Before, the house was full of friends when he "discovered" the bodySee that's the thing...
If they had gone into pure panic mode at the ransom note, called police and then waited by phone in a panic, done nothing other than go get Burke..then maybe that is believable, that they didn't search the house, they assumed the ransom note was real, JonBenet was gone and acted accordingly. They didnt'.
They started making calls right away. I can't remember if they were inviting people over before her body was found or not,maybe not.
Before, the house was full of friends when he "discovered" the body
I truly don't think you even understand that "low probability" -- 4.5 out of 5 with 1 being a match -- does not support probable cause. In other words, it does not support going to trial much less represent inculpatory evidence. Oh, and the Grand Jury agreed.
Oddly enough they claim they didn't get Burke. They let him sleep through the ordeal. RRiigghhtt...See that's the thing...
If they had gone into pure panic mode at the ransom note, called police and then waited by phone in a panic, done nothing other than go get Burke..then maybe that is believable, that they didn't search the house, they assumed the ransom note was real, JonBenet was gone and acted accordingly. They didnt'.
They started making calls right away. I can't remember if they were inviting people over before her body was found or not,maybe not.
Would just one IDI here please answer one question for me?
If unknown male touch DNA is present on both sides of JBR's longjohns, along with DNA intermingled w/ JBR's blood in her undies, do you consider it a "possibility", that these samples could have come from anyone other than the killer?
I just want to know if each and every post here from differing opinions is falling absolutely onto deaf ears or not.
Would just one IDI here please answer one question for me?
If unknown male touch DNA is present on both sides of JBR's longjohns, along with DNA intermingled w/ JBR's blood in her undies, do you consider it a "possibility", that these samples could have come from anyone other than the killer?
I just want to know if each and every post here from differing opinions is falling absolutely onto deaf ears or not.
Before, the house was full of friends when he "discovered" the body
Why would they search the house when they saw she was not in her room and had just read a ransom note stating she was kidnapped for ransom?
Oddly enough they claim they didn't get Burke. They let him sleep through the ordeal. RRiigghhtt...
ocean, yours are the exact same things I posted here a long while back, in my theory of an IDI, so we were at least on the same page at one moment in time.
Could you please answer a few questions for me?
Do you think the killer studied PR's handwriting prior to the murder?
Do you totally discount that the multitude of 'things' which almost all RDI's note in their reasoning as to why they think PR, and/or possibly JR and BR were somehow involved in a 'cover-up'?
If so, would you please explain your reasoning for discounting just a couple of those well known actions and items?
I am sincerely trying to understand your position.
Yes I think it is a POSSIBILITY, but not likely. What are the chances that a fresh pair of panties is going to just have anyone's DNA on them??? And that the long johns DNA is going to have the same exact DNA as the panties???? Listen if the DNA pointed to the Ramsey's I wouldn't say it didn't matter and make all sorts of reasons why it couldn't be them. I would say "wow, I was wrong, the buggers did it". But DNA does not lie. And I'll say that until I'm blue in the face because that is a FACT.
I've noticed that you're condescending and insulting in your posts on other threads, so this doesn't surprise me one bit.
You can go research Cherokee's analysis now, unless you need the information filtered through an "expert" so you'll understand it.
You can report back here when you're through.
Ocean, I think you missed the fact that Hunter was the reason they did not indict...I do understand the other side of the issue, Angel and respect them but cases are brought on actual evidence to prove that someone did the crime. Even a GJ, who will indict a ham sandwich, refused to bite and imo it was because there was no evidence then or now that the Ramseys were involved. I do think that many people do not like the Ramseys but that does not make them murderers .............just easier to accuse imo.
I do not give any weight to the handwriting analysis. I am sorry, I just don't.
Out of a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being the most likely to have written the note and Patsy only having a 4.5 rating which is at the top range and means possibly but not nearly as likely as someone who got assessed at a 1, 2,3,or even a 4. I think they included her into the last 1/2 of a percent range simply to keep her hanging thinking they could put pressure on her to cave.
imoo
How could her parents skin cells on her clothing possibly be evidence of their guilt?
If their DNA was found on the paint brush/tape/restraints, etc. then I would agree. But mom or dad's skin cells found on a child's clothing? It would mean nothing. If was saliva or semen...that's a different thing. But skin cells?
Ocean, I think you missed the fact that Hunter was the reason they did not indict...
The actual findings of the GJ have never been made public.
He can do anything he wishes, in this case he did just that.Do you also think the D.A. is allowed to ignore "best" evidence when they go before a Grand Jury?
an article I read this morning stated that same DNA was found under Jon Benet's fingernails.