Indianagirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,262
- Reaction score
- 61
So, Cox has never been my favorite suspect.
However, I was looking through old news archives and found an article where the Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit thought Cox should be looked at again. This was reported in January of 1996. The Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit is the same unit that concluded in November of 1995, sexual assault was the motive rather that drug dealing.
Snip from article:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...22518&dq=women+disappear+from+home+1992&hl=en
"However, after examining his criminal record this fall, the Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit concluded Cox should be looked at again. Police hedge on how Cox was classified by the group.
“There was not then and is not now enough to push him over into that strong suspect category,” Capt. Darrell Crick said. “Before you’ve got a real suspect you need some direct evidence or some testimony toward that person being a suspect.”
Nothing investigators have found puts Cox near Levitt’s home on or before June 7, 1992, when the women were kidnapped, Crick said." The below statement made by Janis McCall recently seems to answer this question.
Recent statement by Janis McCall:
"He [Cox] was working outside Sherrill and Suzie's house at the time, doing underground cable work."
This info coupled with Janis McCall's recent statement has really peeked my interest in Cox. Obviously, LE wanted to look at him again, as he was part of a grand jury, I believe in 1996. I guess, it's just different for me once I see the same unit that classified this crime most likely as sexual assault, also found that Cox should be looked at again.
However, I was looking through old news archives and found an article where the Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit thought Cox should be looked at again. This was reported in January of 1996. The Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit is the same unit that concluded in November of 1995, sexual assault was the motive rather that drug dealing.
Snip from article:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?i...22518&dq=women+disappear+from+home+1992&hl=en
"However, after examining his criminal record this fall, the Missouri Violent Crime Support Unit concluded Cox should be looked at again. Police hedge on how Cox was classified by the group.
“There was not then and is not now enough to push him over into that strong suspect category,” Capt. Darrell Crick said. “Before you’ve got a real suspect you need some direct evidence or some testimony toward that person being a suspect.”
Nothing investigators have found puts Cox near Levitt’s home on or before June 7, 1992, when the women were kidnapped, Crick said." The below statement made by Janis McCall recently seems to answer this question.
Recent statement by Janis McCall:
"He [Cox] was working outside Sherrill and Suzie's house at the time, doing underground cable work."
This info coupled with Janis McCall's recent statement has really peeked my interest in Cox. Obviously, LE wanted to look at him again, as he was part of a grand jury, I believe in 1996. I guess, it's just different for me once I see the same unit that classified this crime most likely as sexual assault, also found that Cox should be looked at again.