Missouri Mule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,490
- Reaction score
- 1,572
Some good discussion today and analytical views that might explain what took place. I appreciate Hurricane's on-target analysis of certain events that we know or believe took place that night.
It is highly likely that the van was indeed parked in a shaded area and the shadows easily have been misinterpreted as rust. And the colors can easily be seen differently due to the nighttime lighting which distorts the daytime colors seen.
Hurricane has touched on something that I have puzzled over since 1992 and that is the two colors; white and green. We can be relatively certain that both colors were seen by different people. We can deduce that it is unlikely but not impossible that two different vans were used during the planning stage and the actual crime. It is more likely than not that the van did have a cheap paint job, if a second van did not exist. Then we have a probable explanation of the paint color discrepancy if that is true.
I recall also that, and I am going on memory because I no longer have the original newspaper articles, the direction of the vehicles of the girls were in question but not Sherrill's vehicle. (to my knowledge) One has to puzzle again over why the vehicles would have moved at all and if they were moved, how did they not have any forensic evidence as apparently the house didn't have either? I don't know of any particular reason that comes to mind why they would have needed to have been moved, unless the girls came home, left and then returned home a second time. The time line does permit that possibility as we have what is effectively a four hour time window of opportunity of approximately 2:30 AM until 6:30 AM.
If they did leave, why did they leave? And if they did leave, it must have been true that Sherrill's vehicle had to have been parked in the garage the first time as entry could otherwise only have been gained from the west side of the circular driveway; if the driveway was blocked. Since the vehicles ultimately were facing eastward, this argues against their going out since the driveway was not blocked at the time the crime scene was found. However, if the cars were parked westward during an earlier sighting, it also means that the driveway was not blocked. Since they were found facing eastward, and we know that the driveway was unblocked I'm not seeing why the cars would have been deliberately moved. One would have to assume that the girls had to have gone out of the driveway subsequent to arriving home the first time, if the vehicles were in fact seen in different directions at different times. There is no logical reason for the cars to have been moved by the perpetrators that I can fathom. Perhaps Tanglewood has a possible scenario which posted as I wrote this.
It is highly likely that the van was indeed parked in a shaded area and the shadows easily have been misinterpreted as rust. And the colors can easily be seen differently due to the nighttime lighting which distorts the daytime colors seen.
Hurricane has touched on something that I have puzzled over since 1992 and that is the two colors; white and green. We can be relatively certain that both colors were seen by different people. We can deduce that it is unlikely but not impossible that two different vans were used during the planning stage and the actual crime. It is more likely than not that the van did have a cheap paint job, if a second van did not exist. Then we have a probable explanation of the paint color discrepancy if that is true.
I recall also that, and I am going on memory because I no longer have the original newspaper articles, the direction of the vehicles of the girls were in question but not Sherrill's vehicle. (to my knowledge) One has to puzzle again over why the vehicles would have moved at all and if they were moved, how did they not have any forensic evidence as apparently the house didn't have either? I don't know of any particular reason that comes to mind why they would have needed to have been moved, unless the girls came home, left and then returned home a second time. The time line does permit that possibility as we have what is effectively a four hour time window of opportunity of approximately 2:30 AM until 6:30 AM.
If they did leave, why did they leave? And if they did leave, it must have been true that Sherrill's vehicle had to have been parked in the garage the first time as entry could otherwise only have been gained from the west side of the circular driveway; if the driveway was blocked. Since the vehicles ultimately were facing eastward, this argues against their going out since the driveway was not blocked at the time the crime scene was found. However, if the cars were parked westward during an earlier sighting, it also means that the driveway was not blocked. Since they were found facing eastward, and we know that the driveway was unblocked I'm not seeing why the cars would have been deliberately moved. One would have to assume that the girls had to have gone out of the driveway subsequent to arriving home the first time, if the vehicles were in fact seen in different directions at different times. There is no logical reason for the cars to have been moved by the perpetrators that I can fathom. Perhaps Tanglewood has a possible scenario which posted as I wrote this.