No big deal on purchase of a box of wine, paper plates and napkins about 5 hours prior to putting baby to bed. JMHO. It's not the items purchased. (link to items purchased in video at link within post #1 of this thread).
Whether or not this is a big deal depends on if Mom told LE she was there and they are looking at the video to make sure she was where she said she was. LE isn't commenting on that. JMHO.
If (Speculation "if") she didn't tell then yes this is a big deal if they discovered this detail because IMHO they would have not only walked her through her day leading up to Lisa being discovered missing, they would have also walked her through the days prior to Lisa going missing.
However-- If she did tell them they could have very well just been following up on her details of her day. (we've seen LE pull video before from stores to confirm alibi's). JMHO.
The only thing that makes me take note of this (not the wine purchase, doesn't matter what she bought) is on another thread and that is the grand jury supeona for all video filmed by the local news (have to discuss that on other thread).
But when looked at as a whole and in combination. That does give me, personally, a reason to raise an eyebrow at these new details. But that could all change.
Another issue is the way this is being reported on, if LE isn't denying or confirming to the reporter then how is that news agency getting info on Un ID'ed man? Could be someone known to LE but not to anonymous store employee---know what I mean?
I've read but not really commented on Lisa's threads much so sorry if it seems like I'm popping up out of the blue from nowhere
all JMHO