If they are I just don't understand their actions at all.
Same here.I still think RDI is possible and it's not because of the evidence but because of their actions and behaviour.You can't charge someone based on that I know but IMO there still are a lot of questions the R's need to answer.
Which brings me back to,why on earth did the cops agree with those kind of interviews?:banghead::furious:
Excuse me but when reading the 1997 interviews I feel like screaming!I am surprised they don't talk about the weather!And the 1998 one with Lou smit?You swear to God you didn't kill her?GMAB!:banghead:
Yes,officially they said it's not an interrogation but cooperation,the R's helping LE out with info,bla bla bla.But the cops knew exactly what they wanted,to crack the Ramsey's.
Okay,so if that's your goal,then why the heck do you agree with the way the questions were put ?Why do you agree NOT to ask this and that???
I know that they probably thought okay,we're not allowed to ask this and that but at least we have them here.WRONG!Look what happened.
The questions I myself would have wanted to get an answer for were
NEVER asked!
I would have asked them 100 times,
WHY DID YOU CALL LE AND YOUR
FRIENDS AND THE PRIEST OVER IF THE NOTE SAYS SO MANY TIMES THAT IF YOU DO THAT
SHE DIES?!
Oh officer,I didn't read the entire note.....
WHY DID YOU CALL LE AND YOUR
FRIENDS AND THE PRIEST OVER IF THE NOTE SAYS SO MANY TIMES THAT IF YOU DO THAT
SHE DIES?!
WHY DID YOU CALL LE AND YOUR
FRIENDS AND THE PRIEST OVER IF THE NOTE SAYS SO MANY TIMES THAT IF YOU DO THAT
SHE DIES?!
WHY DID YOU CALL LE AND YOUR
FRIENDS AND THE PRIEST OVER IF THE NOTE SAYS SO MANY TIMES THAT IF YOU DO THAT
SHE DIES?!
And this is only ONE of the questions that will always bug everybody...