Greetings Eyes,
Thanks for your kindness...and thanks for your insight, thoughts and sharing your experience per the Riley Fox case. I can appreciate what you are saying though I have not studied the Riley Fox case. I think that we both (all of us) might agree that we can all say almost anything about what we might do given a particular circumstance (such as I did), but until we are actually in that circumstance, the actual truth of our "might" cannot be known.
Also, it's easy to write out the possible course of action as speculation but when you're actually in the situation, your own actions start to change in response to the information you gather.
For example, if your child wanders away, you might think you'd search in a spiral out from their last known location and carefully evaluate any leads you were given before blindly following them.
But then it actually happens and right away, someone says, honestly but mistakenly "I thought I saw a small child wearing a blue T-shirt headed that way."
You'd probably head off that way if your kid was wearing a blue T-shirt.
And so on. So much for your spiralling out plan.
All to say -- I have learned from more than one life event that there are times when I go into a type of animal instinct zone when panicked. I do not eat, drink, rest or sleep until I pursue or deal with what I must. My brain permits few "complex" thoughts outside of the limited ones needed for the pursuit. Finally, based on my experience with myself, I cannot imagine that I would have the slightest bit of wisdom to think of "my own skin" (LDT) -- even if that were foolish for all manner of other responsible reason -- given a missing child or a child in danger.
SBM
How long does that state of animal panic last?
A few years ago, my service dog went missing. I had been in the hospital for eye surgery and our best guess is that he took off looking for me (he excels in devoted, that's for sure!). I checked myself out AMA and started the hunt that night.
It took ten long days before he found me again. I didn't find him, believe me--he spent ten days on the lam, avoiding contact with adult human beings but distributing kisses to the kids in the area he was hunting me. It was when I finally managed to put myself in a position so he could hear me call him that he came running to me. It was completely clear that in his mind, he found me and not the other way around.
I learned from that experience that for me, blind animalistic panic only lasts for about two hours, tops. After that, my body runs out of adrenaline and I am forced to start using my brains again.
That experience also taught me that kids have a life that parallels but is not the same as their parents' lives. I got calls for a couple weeks after we were reunited from people whose kids mentioned casually that they had previously seen "that dog on TV." I had deliberately kept one obvious detail about his appearance to myself to help me filter tips and almost all of those kids nailed it. They really did see him but had no reason to mention it for up to a month.
Hmmm...does anyone think that Tony, with all of his LE knowledge and when considering his wife and he taking an LDT said, "Wait, we need to contact our attorney first." Hmmm.
SBM
As a police detective, I'm pretty sure that TY has the knowledge needed to beat a polygraph. It's widely available and, judging from my own experience, most police officers know all about it. It's not so much doing anything internally like biting your tongue (often suggested), it's more knowing how the questions will be constructed and which questions to deliberately lie in response (it's the control questions).
I've known a couple people who passed job and security clearance polygraphs when their answers to certain questions pertaining to the use of recreational substances in their private life should have failed them. Successfully passing polygraphs has been a feature in most of the recent spy cases, too.
I'm not saying that TY in any way deliberately "threw" the polygraph he took, just saying that it would have been a trivial matter for him to do so.
As has been revealed by DY in her interviews last week, DY and TY were both at work on 4 June 2010. They already had good alibis for themselves, so they were unlikely to become suspects.