Didn't you see the map linked above by cynic? Also, there are the Ramsey estimates of how long they spent at each house and approximate travel times between them from their interviews. While I tend not to take the Ramseys at their word for most things that could be used to their advantage, I believe those things could be verified by investigators. So I think the times given by them in the interviews are likely to be somewhat accurate. It's only the events around that last stop that I have this lingering doubt about. The main timeline I posted has overlapping times in it so different scenarios can be considered. In the "otg Theory" Timeline, I've narrowed down those times to what I believe actually happened (as closely as can be determined based on approximate travel times between houses and time spent at the Walkers' and the Stines'). Here is a screenshot of just that portion of what I have so far:
View attachment 69480
And how do you know there is no tDNA or fingerprints anywhere that belong to him? Do you really think he was never in the house? How about the Whites? Have you ever heard about any tDNA or fingerprints belonging to FW anywhere in the house or in the basement? We know he was there, and that he even touched evidence. Did he leave fingerprints on the tape he picked up, or tDNA anywhere on the blanket? Why did they not find John Ramsey's tDNA on JonBenet's long johns? He carried her stiff body up a flight of stairs holding her only by her waist, and yet there is no report of his tDNA being found co-mingled with that of this phantom intruder. I don't know, but I suspect that evidence from family, or from anyone whose DNA and prints might be expected from non-crime-related matters, was simply ignored.
As to how DS might have returned home, several possibilities: again, look at the map. He could have walked, he could have ridden a bike (remember the supposed bike tracks in the snow?), or he might have even been picked up by car (what do the phone records tell us?).
Don't misunderstand... I'm not a proponent of this theory -- I just can't say I completely dismiss the possibility. (But I do think this is more likely than some unknown intruder.)
And BTW, I'd still like to see someone try to come up with a timeline showing how an intruder might have done this.
otg,
Thanks for the graphic. Any discrepencies in the timing could genuinely be down to amnesia. What might account for them is if they actually stayed longer at the Stines, so forcing them to abandon their last gift drop off?
If DS was involved then the R's version of events must extend back to the visit to the Stines and minimise DS's role. Another explanation for the Stine's postmortem behaviour might result from a quid pro quo resulting from whatever took place at the Christmas party?
Two male assailants might explain JonBenet's injuries neatly, offering an account for JonBenet being whacked with blunt force while also being subjected to a sexual assault?
I'm sympathetic to DS's involvement since it explains much of the adult Stine's postmortem behaviour, note both parents! The Stines were never tossed under the proverbial R's bus, and they have never done any candid media interviews. So there is some kind of dynamic taking place here, is it simply the R's money talking or do the Stines have something to hide, a commonality shared by the R's, hence the silence?
The absence of phone records and if DS's touch-dna was found in the house certainly plays into the possibility that he was present. Remember for years we all thought BR was sound asleep in bed, until the R's admitted he was awake during the 911 call, returning to bed to fake being asleep, why the need to remove him from the R's version of events? I now reckon BR was involved and he assisted in the postmortem staging, some of his remarks suggest he had first hand knowledge of the crime-scene, e.g. how JonBenet was killed.
I reckon the Stine's know who did it!
.