Spellbound
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 37,319
Arrived at booking, taken from live video at https://www.newschannel5.com/news/police-no-credible-sightings-of-waffle-house-shooting-suspect
I was hoping that he'd have shot himself in the woods. Spare the expense of a trial and NO chance of him ever being among society again.
He's limping...
He asked for a lawyer and refused to speak with investigators. (paraphrased from press conference)
ETA: He had a hand gun in his backpack.
That's good. Asking for lawyer suggests he knows right from wrong. So there hopefully goes his insanity defense.
That's good. Asking for lawyer suggests he knows right from wrong. So there hopefully goes his insanity defense.
I doubt it, the officers would have had to tell him he could have a lawyer when they arrested him.
The 4th gun is still missing.
(Looks like its raining pretty good there)
Talking to FBI guy now. Felt they thought they handled things ok in earlier incidents. Says it was IL state police etc. who have the guns back to him. Did the father violate any gun laws - FBI says refer to ATF.
ATF guy says yes, that could be a violation of federal law. Everyone is looking at father too, he could face charges.
Reinking should not have had weapons.
There are things that point to things not working correctly in his brain such as his choice of clothing.
However, he is lucid enough and clever enough to escape and hide.
They would read him his Miranda rights, but if he wanted to talk and was insane, presumably him being read Miranda right wouldn't have stopped him from talking.
I'm not sure you can use someone exercising a Miranda rigt to undermine their defense in court though. That sounds constitutionally dodgy.
I am talking about insanity defense. Insane person isn't supposed to know right from wrong. Therefore presumably would not think they need a lawyer.
Can you use a defendant asking for a lawyer to undermine any defense in court though? That sounds like a legally dodgy area to me.
I am not a lawyer so I don't know. To me that suggests he isn't insane. But I don't know if that can be used as a legal argument in court.
ATF rep said he was not allowed to possess or buy any guns. Father was potentially in violation of federal law and could
potentially face charges. I hope the father is somehow charged and made an example of how a parent should be
culpable in this crime by providing weapons despite knowing and agreeing he was to secure them. Time for the father
to finally manup to his responsibilities that he's been shirking for many years with this son.