The fifth motion which could have turned the case upside down asked Street to suppress the search warrants obtained to search Azoteas Woodland Drive residence, all the evidence investigators seized at the home and the DNA samples taken from Azotea. The defenses challenge said the warrants were based on inaccurate information used by investigators when they tracked Terrells cellphone using Verizon and AT&T records.
Street allowed the warrants and the evidence, ruling the defense had not showed investigators knowingly provided false information or that they were reckless, a state legal requirement. Street said if the two experts had written the affidavits in the same manner, that could have been a basis to suppress the search warrants.
The court finds there was no attempt to deceive the court, Street said, adding later in his ruling that at most, those statements were negligent, not reckless. Negligence, however, did not meet the burden required by law, he said.