Some1Nose
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 318
- Reaction score
- 0
Some thoughts:
Some have hinted, or out-right stated, that Gail was, for lack of a better word, flighty when it came to making plans with someone to do one thing and then turning around to do another; but, maybe she was responding to MPs actions.
MP certainly fits the above description, imo. For example, he reportedly took long, unexpected walks on the beach talking and/or texting on his phone while Gail sat alone on a recent get-away; and MP was due to arrive home in the late evening of 4/29 from a BCBS Company-paid conference in MN but arrived home unexpectedly at a much earlier time.
MP seems to be controlling, at least when it came to Gail. Controlling people, oftentimes, tend to want to isolate their victims via downing the victims friends and family members and discouraging, if not downright denying, the victim from access to those people the victim feels closest to. Controlling abusers like to keep the victim under their thumb, so to speak. I get the idea that although Gail is an independent thinker she also is a pleaser so if MP was vetoing Gails plans to visit with friends, etc. she may have deferred to him.
Also, MPs truth-o-meter would not exactly win a prize for high readings. For instance, the comment he made to the police during a DV call about taking his boat to AL was disputed by some who said MPs boat was already in AL and were certain he didnt have a boat in TN, and MP telling BCBS he was attending the company-paid conference in MN but skipping the conference to go to PA, etc with TH, instead. One could reasonably infer from these types of misrepresentations by MP that there was a larger pattern of untruths occurring. imo
Further, the theory about Gail being abducted from her SM home upon returning from AL is possible, but how did it happen?
It has been stated on here that the SM home had a security system. Did that include surveillance cameras? If so, did LE look at any taped surveillance video? Well .since LE initially stated there was no probable cause that a crime had been committed (no evidence of foul play), it follows that LE did not remove and inspect cameras (if they existed, of course.) Hmmmm .if there were in-fact cameras, who do you suppose did remove them and go through the recorded footage?! (A bit of sarcasm inserted .but remember what happened to the computers?!) imo
Now, since there was a security system, at the very least, if someone tried to enter the home (perhaps including the garage or even the property perimeter depending on the complexity of the alarm system) why wasnt the alarm system triggered and didn't alert authorities/neighbors? Was it disconnected? Turned-off? If so, why?! Was this common practice by members of the household? If not, was it deliberately turned-off on 4/30?
Was Gail a creature of habit around home? Did she follow set routines such as parking her Jeep in a particular place upon arrival from the Lake Home? If so, was that in the garage, driveway, or? Did the children usually go into the home right away and get involved with their particular interests or did they help Mom with unloading the Jeep, household chores, etc.? Could someone have observed their routines from a safe distance for awhile? And, what about the dogs were there two of them or more? Were they kept in an outdoor kennel, dog run or inside? Did they roam the property freely or not? And even if they were usually friendly dogs, they would probably have barked at something or someone unexpectedly showing up in their territory. Why wouldnt the children hear their dogs barking and check on Gail or even maybe hear a disturbance going on outside the house with their Mother and someone else, perhaps even shouting or screaming which should raise the lets go see whats going on level! *(Certainly not implying that the children are at fault in any way, shape or form, would never do that, for the record!) Just trying to figure out how someone could commandeer Gail at the SM home?! Maybe they were hiding inside the home and waited until she was alone, but, again, how did someone access the home without triggering the alarm system unless
If Gail was abducted from the SM home, maybe the abductor/s threatened Gails children or held a gun or knife to Gail. Surveillance cameras, unless disconnected, could certainly be of use, here. And, of course, interviews of the children by LE.
Some have hinted, or out-right stated, that Gail was, for lack of a better word, flighty when it came to making plans with someone to do one thing and then turning around to do another; but, maybe she was responding to MPs actions.
MP certainly fits the above description, imo. For example, he reportedly took long, unexpected walks on the beach talking and/or texting on his phone while Gail sat alone on a recent get-away; and MP was due to arrive home in the late evening of 4/29 from a BCBS Company-paid conference in MN but arrived home unexpectedly at a much earlier time.
MP seems to be controlling, at least when it came to Gail. Controlling people, oftentimes, tend to want to isolate their victims via downing the victims friends and family members and discouraging, if not downright denying, the victim from access to those people the victim feels closest to. Controlling abusers like to keep the victim under their thumb, so to speak. I get the idea that although Gail is an independent thinker she also is a pleaser so if MP was vetoing Gails plans to visit with friends, etc. she may have deferred to him.
Also, MPs truth-o-meter would not exactly win a prize for high readings. For instance, the comment he made to the police during a DV call about taking his boat to AL was disputed by some who said MPs boat was already in AL and were certain he didnt have a boat in TN, and MP telling BCBS he was attending the company-paid conference in MN but skipping the conference to go to PA, etc with TH, instead. One could reasonably infer from these types of misrepresentations by MP that there was a larger pattern of untruths occurring. imo
Further, the theory about Gail being abducted from her SM home upon returning from AL is possible, but how did it happen?
It has been stated on here that the SM home had a security system. Did that include surveillance cameras? If so, did LE look at any taped surveillance video? Well .since LE initially stated there was no probable cause that a crime had been committed (no evidence of foul play), it follows that LE did not remove and inspect cameras (if they existed, of course.) Hmmmm .if there were in-fact cameras, who do you suppose did remove them and go through the recorded footage?! (A bit of sarcasm inserted .but remember what happened to the computers?!) imo
Now, since there was a security system, at the very least, if someone tried to enter the home (perhaps including the garage or even the property perimeter depending on the complexity of the alarm system) why wasnt the alarm system triggered and didn't alert authorities/neighbors? Was it disconnected? Turned-off? If so, why?! Was this common practice by members of the household? If not, was it deliberately turned-off on 4/30?
Was Gail a creature of habit around home? Did she follow set routines such as parking her Jeep in a particular place upon arrival from the Lake Home? If so, was that in the garage, driveway, or? Did the children usually go into the home right away and get involved with their particular interests or did they help Mom with unloading the Jeep, household chores, etc.? Could someone have observed their routines from a safe distance for awhile? And, what about the dogs were there two of them or more? Were they kept in an outdoor kennel, dog run or inside? Did they roam the property freely or not? And even if they were usually friendly dogs, they would probably have barked at something or someone unexpectedly showing up in their territory. Why wouldnt the children hear their dogs barking and check on Gail or even maybe hear a disturbance going on outside the house with their Mother and someone else, perhaps even shouting or screaming which should raise the lets go see whats going on level! *(Certainly not implying that the children are at fault in any way, shape or form, would never do that, for the record!) Just trying to figure out how someone could commandeer Gail at the SM home?! Maybe they were hiding inside the home and waited until she was alone, but, again, how did someone access the home without triggering the alarm system unless
If Gail was abducted from the SM home, maybe the abductor/s threatened Gails children or held a gun or knife to Gail. Surveillance cameras, unless disconnected, could certainly be of use, here. And, of course, interviews of the children by LE.
