wfgodot
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 30,166
- Reaction score
- 796
Here's her "Amber Alert, Tenneesse-Style" page: http://radioamber.net/?p=4483
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't recall anything about Holly except for the press releases on the TBI site.
Her poster is still on the FBI site; the height and weight estimates have not been changed there to match the TBI estimates, which were upped a few weeks back.
I think she was listed as a missing child (in addition to a "missing person")...because there was some debate about why she would be listed as such considering her age. Some posters speculated it was because she was a full-time student still living at home.
Here's her "Amber Alert, Tenneesse-Style" page: http://radioamber.net/?p=4483
2. Has anyone started a timeline? If so, where to find it?
Thanks,
Jay Bird
I agree, 10EC. The way he desposited items shows inexperience.
LE likely is keeping the second item under wraps in hope for when they do get a POI they can verify that he is their guy if he says something about the item during the interrogation process.
I sure hope they can find Holly and in the process hope people won't forget her.
Maybe you're thinking of NCMEC? She's listed on there as a missing child.
http://www.ncmec.org/missingkids/se...NCMA&seqNum=1&caseLang=en_US&searchLang=en_US
The TBI has not posted info on Holly's case- at least anywhere I can find.
THe FBI has:
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/kidnap
and NCMEC has:
http://missingkids.com/missingkids/...NCMA&seqNum=1&caseLang=en_US&searchLang=en_US
To me, this means that whatever info LE has gathered regarding Holly's case, has been passed to the FBI.
JMO.
Thanks Bean. This must be what I was thinking of.
I'm not sure about this. I read local reports on FB that said people have called tips to the FBI and they were told to call the TBI number instead. I'm not sure if that means anything?
I am beginning to think this has something to do with the family. NOT that the family is involved in Holly's disappearance at all. But that the crime was committed due to something only known to the family and that LE does not want this to get out.
That's my mind-boggling thought for today.
I think cynicism helps in being a good investigator.
I must say, I can figure out the who done its on TV. However, in real life there is not enough public information to identify a significant POI before LE.
Let me ask, how does knowing the identity of the second significant find direct your thinking to solving this case? Knowing if it was her cell phone would draw you to what direction in solving the case?
Also, may I suggest that if the perp was intentionally spreading evidence it was more from inexperience than immaturity. Why would he risk being seen? If Holly was securely hidden, why not keep the items in the same location?
Also, how was this behavior predictable?
Thanks for your help.
<respectfully snipped for space>
I repeat my question from a previous post- can any of the readers deduce a a reason why public searches seem to have been discontinued? My suggestion is non-sinister and practical, and has nothing to do with press leaks from searchers. I am just waiting for someone else to come up with my stupid idea before I will acknowledge it.
"What happened? OMG. We'll take care of the body. You get rid of her stuff."
Crime of passion. They know who. They know why. They know how. They have post-event partial witnesses & finds that have helped them confirm who and how. They haven't figured everything out about where. They need one more clue to move forward with direct inquiries. Burial/disposal site on private property, or if there are no accessories-after-fact, may have been contemplated in advance. Either way, volunteer searches wouldn't do the trick. Unnamed is/are under surveillance.
JMHO