Gardener1850
Timeline Guru (Still Remembering Cupcake)
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 42,106
- Reaction score
- 117,318
According to The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), his remains are unrecognizable, but they know that he's white. Also they estimate that he is an adult under the age range of 40 and at least 6ft tall.
Apparently his hands are MIA.
There seems to be a typo in the description of his hands being gone. It currently says: "The hand and hands were not located in the bag or on scene."
My speculation only on this, but I wonder if it was supposed to say "the head and hands"?!?
That would explain the large height range given (6' 0"-6' 8") and why they know he was white but described him as "unrecognizable". Hands often get eaten first by small wildlife, but if the head is missing too (my speculation only) that makes me think the murderer was trying to make identification harder.
I also think we should consider the belt might have been second hand and not his name. If the killer wanted to prevent identification of the body, why leave a belt with the person's name on it?
MOO.