I don't see anything in the article or any other about them being dropped off in front of a Kennel. It says they were allegedly dropped off 9 miles away on the same road they lived on. Davis stated that she "thinks they drove up and dropped them off". They are still actively searching for the property the dogs were "dropped" on. The dogs were confirmed to be the Daniel's by neighbors and family.I have never heard that the grandparents live in the house with them. The grandparents (Joe's parents) live nearby, I think. (At least in Dickson County, I think.) Eta this is the impression I get anyway. I don't know for sure.
I think the dogs were hungry, but "starved" is an overstatement. There is a video of them (post rescue). By "starved", I was imagining emaciated animals, these are not.
It's known whose dogs they were because they dropped them off in front of a kennel. Someone saw per media accounts.
They were dumped the night of April 1.
Eta, article with video about dogs
https://www.newschannel5.com/news/abused-dogs-belonged-to-daniels-family
If no one saw them dropped off then how do they know the dogs didnt just get out and run off? Would little Joe have gotten to missing them so much he would go looking for them?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk